this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59407 readers
2873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The flip side of this is that hackers can brick the same machines.....

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Depends how its set up. So long as it's fully independent and disconnected from existing digital infrastructure it should be safer. It could be as simple as explosives hard-wired with a buried line running up into some bunker up in the mountains.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So long as it’s fully independent and disconnected from existing digital infrastructure it should be safer.

It's a puzzle, because anything with too many safety features can be easily disarmed. But anything with too few can be prematurely detonated.

Imagine what happens to the Taiwanese economy if there's a Chinese feint or false alarm and the facility bricks itself. A massive economic downturn would not work to the benefit of an island so heavily reliant on foreign trade.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why the hell would they advertise this is beyond me...

[–] SineIraEtStudio@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My understanding is that some of the benefits China would get from invading Taiwan is the control of Taiwan's world-leading semiconductor industry. So making it public knowledge that any invading force (i.e. China) would not be able to take over their production capabilities is a small deterrent.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Taiwan’s world-leading semiconductor industry

China already produces over 50% of the world's semiconductors.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The question is if their remote disable will be triggered before the US blows the factory up anyway.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just add some brown people and throw a wedding. The factory will be leveled within hours.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You know what doesn't convince people to rethink how they view America, or empire?

Arbitrarily inserting comments like that into topics where they're disconnected and off topic.

Wait a minute...are you a DoD contractor whose mission it is to make any critic of America look whiney and detached from reality?

[–] machineLearner@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He’s not wrong is he though? And besides, what is Taiwan besides an American client state?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Mitch McConnell's wife and Trump's Secretary of Labor - Elaine Chao - is from a family of enormously wealthy Taiwanese shipping magnets.

California is flush with Taiwanese-born politicians, business owners, and investors.

Taiwanese's ruling class goes to school in the US, owns property in the US, and has a very friendly relationship with the American financial system.

I would put them more on par with Israel than, say, the Philippines or some Latin American Banana Republic. They've got much more influence over us than a traditional client state like Puerto Rico or Guam.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

i assume by disable they probably mean, something along the lines of irreversibly contaminating the whole of the assembly line.

I'd be curious to know how specifically they're going about this.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What happened if... purely hypothetically... China develops competitive chip fabrication plants that exports at scales rivalrious to Taiwan.

And then fear of an invasion provokes detonation of Taiwan's own facilities.

Wouldn't this turn China into a domestically source monopoly of high end chips?

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's easier said than done. A few key pieces took decades to figure out and even now many can only be produced by one or two companies, like ASML.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

SMIC makes 5nm chips and is on the cusp of 3nm.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Marketing terms mean nothing. SMIC's nodes are nowhere near the real transistor density of TSMC's or even Intel's.

But what's worse than that are the yields. I don't believe we have public numbers on their newest node yet, but their self-reported yields on their "7nm" process as of late 2022 was a pathetic 10-15%. TSMC's 7nm yield (and you should remember that TSMC's 7nm is vastly superior to SMIC's) was getting over 70% yield when it was in pre-production trialing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In that case, I guess there's no problem and Taiwan will maintain semiconductor supremacy forever

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not what I said, but thank you for contributing that strawman to the conversation.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Chinese firms are end running US sanctions with improved technologies and your response seems to be "But their chips aren't as good so it doesn't count".

Nevermind the rapid pace of development or the fact that only TSMC and Samsung seems capable of matching it.

The idea that Chinese manufacturers need Taiwan is demonstrably false.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, I was dismissing your assertion that Chinese fab companies are at the same level, or ahead of, TSMC. The truth is they aren't even close. This is something that even China themselves openly admit.

That's a second time you've strawmanned me. I don't appreciate words being put in my mouth.

Samsung? I'm sorry, are you keeping up with the industry at all? Samsung isn't matching shit. They're a node behind Intel and 2.5 behind TSMC. What development are they matching?

And yes, a multitude of Chinese manufacturers do need Taiwan. China in general does. Will that be true in the far future? Who knows. But it's certainly true now and in the short term.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Samsung? I’m sorry, are you keeping up with the industry at all? Samsung isn’t matching shit. They’re a node behind Intel and 2.5 behind TSMC

Samsung seizes 2nm AI chip deal, challenging TSMC’s reign: Japan's PFN, a TSMC partner since 2016, chose Samsung's 2nm for AI chips.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The US will rebuild their chip manufacturing somewhere else

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Israel grants Intel $3.2 billion for new $25 billion chip plant

But Intel has long since fallen behind the pack of semiconductor manufacturers. If they could just do their own Taiwanese foundry, they'd have done it by now and reaped comparable boosts in revenue.

As it stands, China is the majority manufacturer of semiconductors - responsible for more than half of all chips produced - because they're building foundries far faster and at higher quality than their American peers at Intel.

Taiwan is the only country keeping pace with China. Losing them would only strengthen the Chinese export market.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As it stands, China is the majority manufacturer of semiconductors - responsible for more than half of all chips produced - because they’re building foundries far faster and at higher quality than their American peers at Intel.

the reason why they produce half of all semi conductors, probably has more to do with the type of semi conductors they produce, mainly IC chips. As opposed to things like CPUs and GPUs, they've only recently started getting into that space. The intels and TSMCs of the world produce highly optimized designs and fab processes specifically for things like CPUs and GPUs.

A chip with 8 and gates on it is probably vastly easier to produce than an 8088 cpu, for example.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

probably has more to do with the type of semi conductors they produce, mainly IC chips

The Rise of China GPU Makers: AI and Tech Sovereignty Drive New GPU Entrants

Two of the new Chinese companies have hired ex AMD and Nvidia architects to start their GPU companies, and another two use Img.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Ok winnie the pooh, like they are going to tell you

[–] corroded@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is a good thing, but it's hardly unique. Any advanced manufacturing facility will have remote access to their equipment in case an operator needs reconfigure it, transfer data, or in this case if they're invaded by Lesser Taiwan.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

China should just replicate Taiwan somewhere like they replicate Paris, Venice, etc. and call it a day.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

China already had 53% global market share in semiconductors back in 2020