this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
1203 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

5490 readers
2020 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CM400@lemmy.world 159 points 1 day ago (1 children)

NASA, like the post office, is such a public benefit that we should be funding it well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 48 points 1 day ago

And absolutely no one paying attention was shocked.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 123 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

NASA does research. They push the boundaries corporations can't.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Depends where the funding goes! And then musk can take a cut.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corporations cannot carry the risk involved. Because else it would be similar to the medicine industry, but there is no large market to sell to.

We're going to Mars is not something you can sell in a boardroom, because why? What is the ROI?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What I'm saying is musk wants to divert all of the government funding from NASA to spacex. ROI is all the funding from the government, every year for decades. It's not a sell a product and profit model in the regular sense. And this way musk can personally take a cut of all that funding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lemmus@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

This is what losing a space race looks like.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago (11 children)

The challenging thing here is that NASA does have deep, systemic problems and is in need of some overhaul. SLS is a breathtakingly expensive boondoggle, lunar gateway has no reason to exist, Orion is underpowered and overweight, Mars Sample Return’s entire mission is in question, JWST was a decade behind schedule and an order of magnitude over budget, and the list goes on. Extreme risk-aversion and congressional meddling have resulted in a bureaucratic quagmire of an organization. It’s hard to find nasa projects that are going well.

Of course I don’t think a gorilla with a sledgehammer as we’re sadly going to see from Trump will make things any better, we need a surgeon with a scalpel.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

NASA budget shouldn't matter on the scale that it does. It is <2% of the US military spendings

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This is such a common theme.

There are huge systemic problems which the "establishment" will demonstratably not address and Trump appears to be the answer to many voters... but him effectively addressing them is a wild fantasy.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

We are about a decade plus into the current political theme of "throw the baby out with the bathwater". It's scary. These people have no plan. It's the levellers and the diggers all over again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly I think lunar gateway is a decent idea, Its the easiest thing to do thats new as far as space is concerned and thus potentially the cheapest way to gain international co-operation, public interest, and potentially ignite another space race. Looking forward it can can potentially act as a life raft for any future lunar colonies in the event of a mishap. And while a moon colony isn't as impressive as a mars one its much safer to practice on given that emergency re-supply can actually get there before the crew are already skeletonized. A moon base itself can then act as support for moon based telescopes (which have significant advantages, and disadvantages of course) and if you can get some kind of manufacturing going its far easier to launch from the moon than it is from earth, even if the moon just ends up as a glorified space gas station.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Moon base on the surface is a great idea, I’m 1000% in favor.

Lunar gateway is in NRHO, which means rendezvous windows are a week apart. This makes it pretty useless for any kind of emergency. It’s in this crazy orbit because Orion is a pig that can’t transport a crew to low lunar orbit and back.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

SLS should definitely be on the chopping block. It was a good idea to fund two possibilities for heavy lift rockets but SLS is clearly going nowhere. At this point, Bozo’s rocket seems like a better choice despite being so much farther behind in development.

But lunar gateway would be pretty useful if we really are going to establish a long term presence. It would allow:

  • having the lander and the transportation be different vehicles
  • keeping a backup lander convenient
  • having a secure place to store extra supplies until a base can be built
  • having a possible backup place for astronauts in case the lunar base has problems

Any sort of problem on lunar base would go bad real fast if the nearest help is two weeks away.

Having a place to park and transfer lets them not only use different vehicles for traveling and landing but also differently sized vehicles

…. But it’s only worthwhile if we’re establishing a long term presence

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

God, I love how the incoming cabinet has zero redeeming qualities amongst them.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

I think I would rather be pleasantly surprised.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

When has that stopped them when they have the Congress and the courts?

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

"Sure is a nice publicly funded and scientifically minded space program you got here. It would be a shame if anything happened to it."

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 20 points 1 day ago

Convenient? That was the whole plan with buying X all along, to get into politics, and this guy is still there keeping it relevant.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't that fat fuck get lots of money from NASA?

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's cutting out the middleman. See? Efficiency! ~/s~

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Step 1) hurt other manufacturers more than Tesla

Step 2) benefit SpaceX by gutting NASA

Step 3) no regulations for digging tunnels?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No regulations for digging tunnels is the boring part

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

What sucks the most is NASA fights tooth and nail for funding as it is. Imagine gutting it, and then coming back 4 years later to ask just for their existing budgets back.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please come to europe and lets make the european space agency get their shit together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

President Musk is just there to be less inconvenienced and to revel in finding an easily manipulated orange loophole to being the president of the United States.

I guess that makes us all Musks workers now. What could go wrong?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›