Yah, that’s what happens when independent news outlets get sold off to the highest bidder.
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
14 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I noticed the equal but opposite with the Drudge Report.
We’ll see what happens with the onion having purchased infowars.
I didn't know it was a turn, so much as they were temporarily not saying out loud. Remember that Gavin McInnes is also a founder, and he is the proudest boy.
Vice could not be reached for comment, as Vice’s publicly listed press email address now appears to be a private Google Group that doesn’t accept external emails.
Really shows the state of things.
Still, better than Xitter.
If Vice fixes their email as a result of this article I'll agree. It's only better if it's accidental.
Sad that it has happened to Vice but I am more upset about NPR. They have Nazified so quickly it makes my head spin. They have posted fawning articles about RFK Jr and Elon Musk recently that are so credulous and anti-social it hurts to read.
Imagine trying to call up Chappell Roan for a tiny desk after you've become a propaganda outlet for a nazi government.
I wasn't aware, that's surprising from NPR. Could you please share the title or link to the NPR articles you're referring to?
Sure. Here's pair of examples as mentioned. Sorry if this bums you out, it bums me out.
STONE: It's certainly a strange, almost dizzying moment for the public health field. Kennedy is well known for questioning the scientific consensus, pushing inaccurate information about vaccines. He's founded an antivaccine advocacy group and is generally antagonistic toward mainstream medicine. As NPR has covered, he's promoted unproven treatments for COVID and made other basless claims related to health.
At the same time, there's no denying that on chronic disease prevention, there is some real overlap between what he talks about as his priorities and what you hear from scientists who work in this field. One of them is Barry Popkin, a professor at UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health. He says, he would welcome meaningful action on nutrition and the food supply.
BARRY POPKIN: If it comes, I'll support it, and I'll be super surprised, and academia will be behind them and so on. But I do not see that. I fear the worst.
AUBREY: RFK Jr. puts food- and diet-related policy changes at the top of his agenda, getting rid of a host of food additives and dyes and reforming the SNAP food assistance program, formerly known as food stamps. Kennedy says beneficiaries of the program should not be allowed to use their benefits to buy soda or processed foods, and points to the need for change. Dr. Mozaffarian agrees there's plenty of room for innovation in this program.
MOZAFFARIAN: SNAP is one of the biggest handouts to the food industry, including for lots of junk food and unhealthy food. I think it's absolutely critical that states are allowed to innovate and try new approaches and test them.
I understand being bumed out by what's being reported in these articles, these are bad news. But I don't see an obvious hard right turn in how NPR is reporting. The article on Elon even mentions criticism for SpaceX's environmental impact.
Gotta suck up to whoever's the most powerful at the moment I suppose