Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
Comments.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
I wanted to play this game for a while now, but it's probably gonna take me like two months to get through, and finding that kind of time is tough, with the gazillions of other games, that I also want to check out.
Now, I'll definitely wait for this patch and maybe a few bug fixes (since it's Owlcat), to finally get to this one (hopefully next year).
It's one of the best RPGs in the last decade, easy. Unless you already know how pathfinder works, it's going to take longer than two months to beat it. There's an insane amount of gameplay.
Ahh... i remember kingmaker. 200 hours is what a single playthrough took. Wrath of the rightuous improved greatly upon the previous game.
I'd add probably 30-50 hours just figuring out what classes you want to play. Then spells. Then actual game mechanics. So that's puts a safe starting point for a full run after 150 hours.
Then add the 200 single playthrough to that.
I got a little upset when then released Rogue Trader, just because they finished their new game before I finished my first lol
Haha true that! Bot to mention finding portrait art to match the character design.
Yeah, 220 hours for mine, including the DLC campaign. Game is a buggy mess though and not properly balanced, especially near the end. As long as WotR improves at least those things, I'd be happy.
not properly balanced
IME, that's just the dangers of running Pathfinder. There can be such a disparity between a well built character and someone just going through character creation picking random stuff that it's hard to balance for both possibilities. As a DM, I've always kinda played it by ear and tried to have some way to scale the difficulty on the fly built into as many encounters as I can.
Since I got basically no experience with DnD or PF, I've used build guides for my playthrough, so I'd like to think they were well built.
As I've written in another post, the last third of the game was just a complete slog, with overtuned enemies, that took far too long to kill.
I haven't gotten that far into the game, but I can't imagine how awful that would be with a badly built character if it was a slog with a good one. If it wasn't such a time investment, I'd consider building an intentionally awful party and see how brutal it was lol.
I did play on core difficulty ("intended PF experience" or something), but as far as I can tell nothing affects the enemy HP, just how much damage you take (maybe there's something in the custom modifiers). I guess even with a weak character you can get through on a lower difficulty, but it'll take ages.
However, even if I used proper builds, I still used my very limited knowledge of these games and systems. If you know what you're doing, you can probably use better spells or abilities to kill things faster.
I barely had any bugs/glitches in kingmaker. Only a couple of visual ones. Nothing game breaking even though I messed around with mods too. The game was balanced really well too. Pathfinder is just a hard system.
Wotr is better in a lot of ways, but I did encounter a game breaking bug where one of the army stats stopped levelling.
Nothing game breaking for me as well, but tons of small stuff, plus atrocious performance.
Also, in my opinion, the last third of the game was just a complete slog. Enemies had just far too much health. Some of the final fights against trash mobs took as long or maybe longer than the final boss. I wouldn't call that balanced.
Dunno if you want to count it towards the balance, but the Kingdom Management was also not implemented well at all. In the first half it's just event after event, no breathing room. The second half it's constantly waiting, doing nothing, just clicking "next."
Yeah – it’s a beast. Even on easy mode I was clocking in at 120 hours on my first playthrough.
Their first pathfinder game was so excruciatingly guide dang it I never finished it, and never even considered this game. I kind of assumed it was the same way, where there's stuff like "Ah, you didn't return to this unmarked forest on day 7, so now you never get a wizard"
Oh, now I remember having an argument on here with some asshole who insisted I just have "fomo" over this. Sign posting and foreshadowing are only to appease fomo, I guess.
Did they ever make the azata better? Or is it still a kid's idea of freedom? Azatas are easily the coolest outsiders in Pathfinder, it's kinda sad that the unbelievably strong start went into mostly a big joke path.
Make the path better in what way? I personally enjoyed the path and it matches nicely with Arueshalae's story arc. Creating a tree that slowly destroys the abyss is also no joke, even if you got a childish dragon companion tagging along.
It can never beat the Aeon path though.
Don't know. It just feels like the path is overwhelmingly focused on a stupid joke on the part of the court. When i first played through it i was expecting less 'childlike' and more 'wonder' and it's just disappointing the way it is, especially for someone who liked azatas before they went into the game.