this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
1174 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

45751 readers
1211 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 100 points 4 months ago (2 children)

blocker blocker blocker blocker blocker

MUSHROOM MUSHROOM

blocker blocker blocker blocker blocker

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 45 points 4 months ago

(and when things go bad...)

Ad! Ad!! Oh, it's an ad. :(

Blocker blocker blocker blocker blocker blocker blocker blocker ...

[–] JaumeI@programming.dev 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Oh Great Cthulhu, we're old.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 73 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A møøse ønce bit my sister

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

Pøør sister!

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 45 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's times like these that online advertisements need to get creative to get ahead in this never ending adblocking arms race, just like the very subtle advertisement in the car chase scene in the Academy Award nominated film, "Barbie", now available on Blu-ray and select streaming services.

[–] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I know right? The other day I was drinking a coke and wondering about side effects of weight loss drugs such as Ozempic, and it occurred to me that advertising could be a lot more creative and subtle.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But there is something to be said about superliminal messaging as well.

Instead of trying to subtly influence people to watch your movie, why not tell them directly to watch your movie instead?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melody@lemmy.one 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So we have:

  • Ad Blockers
  • 'Ad Blocker' blockers
  • ''Ad blocker' blocker' blockers
  • '''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers
  • ''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers
  • '''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers' blockers; and finally;
  • ''''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers' blocker' blockers; with;
  • '''''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers' blocker' blocker' blockers

in development.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's like playing Uno; but with reverse cards only.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

It's like playing Uno No Mercy, with only reverse-draw-10 cards

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 43 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Youtube is wasting ressources, it's a fight they can't win

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

They have infinite resources. They're making gestures to dissuade normies. I suspect this will get them most of the result they want. They're also wasting time, effort and resources of adblock programmers (and that is a far more limited resource).

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If they had infinite resources, they wouldn't need to worry about adblockers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 11 points 4 months ago

Sure but as long as there is a least one dedicated bearded dude hidden in a dark underground room behind his screen, they will be defeated. No matter how much they spent on the new technology. What I mean is that devs might burn out, they will still be replaced by others. And we get such people faster than youtube is able to burn them out

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Exactly this. They ALWAYS lose this fight.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ad ad oooohhhhh it’s an ad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 33 points 4 months ago (6 children)

What this? I cant hear you over my high definition yt-dlp content.

Where i am going I haven’t needed a google account in over a year.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What will happen when ads are injected in the video stream directly.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

At that point i will either have to use an ai tool to scrub the filth out

Or

Consider if i really need whatever content is within it and touch some grass instead.

[–] Ansis100@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The same thing that happened with sponsored segments.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Look forward to the day they require eye tracking & answering questions about the ads they showed

[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 months ago

Please drink a verification can.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 9 points 4 months ago

With yt-dlp? Skip them manually.

Like, my main issue with ads is all the tracking they do. If they add non-targeted ads to the video file I downloaded, whatever, I'll just fast forward through that part of the video.

[–] g1ya777@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Personally, I use Tubular on my phone ( Newpipe fork with sponsorBlock ), freetube on PC, and Smart tube on my android tv.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Koyaanisqatsi@lemm.ee 27 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Blocker & Blocker

2 Blocker 2 Blocked

Blocker Tokyo Drift

...

[–] Zdvarko@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Block of the Bockers; Return of the Blockings

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No one can beat Ublock Origin

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 months ago

I hope it stays that way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Youtube's crackdown on adblocker usage has created a huge Streisand effect. There's a lot of people all over the world that would've never known about adblockers if youtube just didn't say anything and didn't do exactly what they did.

Now, all the major adblockers and ad-blocking browsers have stepped their game up and made it so people can still block ads on youtube.

There's userscripts you can get from greasyfork...or is it greaseyfork that allow you to bypass all of youtube's bullshit.

100% of the videos that actually belong on youtube are almost always demonetized anyway.

If you're not constantly getting demonetized on every video you put out, despite bending over backwards to follow the rules, you're doing something wrong.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There’s a lot of people all over the world that would’ve never known about adblockers

I see this sentiment a lot. Is there any reliable data to support it?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DNOS@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

YouTube can definitely afford a war ship and pay people to shoot...we may have enough people to operate a death star for free but can we afford one ?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The image doesn't quite work because youtube needs a MASSIVE solution that works, scales, doesn't fuck up their infrastructure and on and on and on.

Meanwhile on the user front, all your doing essentially is just skipping parts of a video, that will always be infinitely cheaper easier to do. Challenging for sure, but the solution can be small.

Even something as stupid as delaying your video start by 1 min, pre buffering then skipping ads. It's brute force and barbaric but the point is that Google can't do shit against that.

My ultimate vision is AI that preloads videos you want and detects ads / sponsor segments and just skips them / cuts them out on your device.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Another way to think about it... YouTube has huge amounts of compute resources, but per user it's an extremely small amount. Your phone has orders of magnitude more power to dedicate to you than YouTube does. Collectively, we have more processing power than YouTube.

[–] bykdd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago

as a firefox user i cant give up and just installed freetube, exported everything from yt. its great

[–] Roopappy@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago

This just in: Google suddently discontinues support for popular and profitable ad blocker blocker blocker blocker, because literally all they know how to do is kill things that work.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

God I love the web platform!

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

So the final step is the internet blows up?

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What of I told you there is an easier way of blocking ads: noscript.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I guess you haven't heard they're experimenting with injecting ads right into the videos on the server. Just turning off scripts won't do anything for that.

[–] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Depending on your country, these ads still need to be marked clearly as such. And for accessibility reasons, that mark will always be machine readable.

So blockers will be fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is Google Chrome fighting uBlock country-specific? I use Chrome on Win 10 with uBlock and haven't seen a YouTube ad outside of the mobile app in ages. For me, uBlock never stopped working in Chrome and I watch YouTube videos every 1-2 days.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ublock publishes patches so fast you never had a problem

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Wow, these guys are even more awesome than I thought then...

load more comments
view more: next ›