this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
379 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

While the robotic dog seen at Mar-a-Lago is not armed, she says competitors appear to be experimenting with models that are.

“People are trying to weaponise these dogs,” Cummings adds, citing a Chinese model with an attached rifle which she learned about at a robotics meeting this week.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Accelerationism coming from exactly the social class we expected

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

These are not good boys

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is such a shame, I mean we could be putting those bots to good use.

Can I get a rule 34 on these robots?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Coo at them. Pet them. Call them a good doggie. Drop a treat on them, all in defiance.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's a unique approach to suicide-by-cop

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The ones at Mar-A-Lago are unarmed.

My approach to the armed ones, particularly the TASER-equipped ones used by some US law enforcement departments, would be very different.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

They are also not autonomous. They have armed secret service agents very nearby. If the sensors on the dog alert them, trigger happy armed guards will come.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Joke's on them, I won the robot dogs over with my pets and can turn the sentry turrets against the guards.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There's always a place for a happy little accident.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago

So they have a coffee brewer on their back but you cannot pet? Please make sense.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because they are too expensive for schools to buy although I think that would be where they should be first.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s a golf coarse… it’d be perfect for the simplicity of wheels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

They're guard dogs

Keep the proles out.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

oh cool/good

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›