this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
617 points (97.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7238 readers
208 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 132 points 4 months ago (4 children)

He should probably withdraw... and stop raping

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Him being a monster, latest proof, isn't news because it is so well known that he is a monster. They like that about him.

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 20 points 4 months ago

I legitimately think they believe the federal courts have it in for him because the news only is opinion and never airs the allegations

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

But he's good for the economy!

/S

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 55 points 4 months ago (38 children)

But did you guys hear that Joe Biden is old??!?!?

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

He also has my bed time, I'm 30 yrs younger than him

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago

clearly the candidates are exactly the same so we should not vote in the election

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 49 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Thank God the Daily Boulder is covering this.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 months ago (20 children)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] sunzu@kbin.run 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

It’s a rock each day about the size of a boulder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago (4 children)

What a fucking dumpster fire of a website.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 16 points 4 months ago (7 children)

You surf the web with no adblocker? Interesting choice.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Odd mine looks much different

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ad blocker? I've never installed one on my phone.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I use ublock origin on my Firefox default but this seems to have opened in chrome since it was a redirect. I'm honestly not sure lol

[–] danafest@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

+1000 anytime I accidentally open a link in Chrome I'm reminded how utterly unusable the "modern" Internet is without ad blocking at a bare minimum

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] charleroi2@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

52$ for pistachio? WTF

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

incredible. journalism is thriving

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Facing increased scrutiny for raping children is appropriate. Also appropriate , facing 15 years in prison for raping children. Of course unless it was an official act by the president.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Rape of a child should be more than 15 years in prison.

[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Technically, if he obstructed the case while president by ordering his DOJ to drop it or obviscate it, it could be considered an official act.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Conservatives are A+ 100% OK with raping a child, even with violence. Their religion does not oppose it and neither does their political leadership.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

the person that authored the article is named "STAFF WRITER" which I support using.

the story is not the author's identity.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 months ago

Renewed scrutiny huh?

I want to know why the scrutiny needed to be renewed. Why did scrutiny diminish under these kinds of allegations?

I can see from the comments something about this being affected by him becoming president, and I'm left here thinking, shouldn't the FBI/CIA/enforcement agencies, be able to operate without the president getting all up in their business?

That's just sad, honestly. I won't assume Trump is guilty until he is convicted of the crime, but there should be nothing that can prevent law enforcement from fully investigating what happened and providing justice for that girl.

The fact that this is a headline at all is pretty dark.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Okay, question: NOW??!!

Fuck that guy with a red hot poker but this is an issue NOW??!!

prediction: nothing will come of this because it's a weak attempt at electoral October Surprising

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Define scrutiny?

[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

dang so thats why he anti-abortion

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 4 months ago
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Im sorry but raping minors only makes him more of a right candidate for the job.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The Rights*

[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 3 points 4 months ago

The website doesn't seem to be trustworthy when it comes to news - https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-boulder-bias/

load more comments
view more: next ›