this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
241 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

55734 readers
2729 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After all, the privacy of our mind may be the only privacy we have left.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Summary:

  • Colorado passes first-in-nation law to protect privacy of biological or brain data, which is similar to fingerprints if used to identify people.
  • Advances in artificial intelligence have led to medical breakthroughs, including devices that can read minds and alter brains.
  • Neurotechnology devices, such as Emotiv and Somnee, are used for health care and can move computers with thoughts or improve brain function and identify impairments.
  • Most of these devices are not regulated by the FDA and are marketed for wellness.
  • With benefits come risks, such as insurance companies discriminating, law enforcement interrogating, and advertisers manipulating brain data.
  • Medical research facilities are subject to privacy laws, but private companies amassing large caches of brain data are not.
  • The Neurorights Foundation found that two-thirds of these companies are already sharing or selling data with third parties.
  • The new law takes effect on Aug. 8, but it is unclear which companies are subject to it and how it will be enforced.
  • Pauzauskie and the Neurorights Foundation are pushing for a federal law and even a global accord to prevent brain data from being used without consent.
[–] xan@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

The 2/3 companies already selling data is awful. ☹️

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Ticking time bomb! Think of the children!!! Law or no law, this will be abused if it can be. Having the law is still a good thing I guess.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Next up in the dystopian cyberpunk pipeline: in-brain data encryption technology with a programmed tamper killswitch. Like that shit in the movie "Elysium".

Aren't you guys loving this ride so far?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is why I only think in ROT13

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it could identify you or be used for identification purposes it will fall into at least CAs personal information/biometric information definition I believe…

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

- Sir, the brainwave recording shows images of... a room with walls made of boobs?

- Oh... I know who this guy is.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Of course I know him, he's me!

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Will this law protecting self incriminating myself if feds use it to gather evidences?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're actually already protected.

For example a polygraph can only be used with consent.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Polygraphs are also complete pseudoscience. The guy running the test can make it spit out whatever results he wants.