this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
377 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

55734 readers
2729 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 89 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Wait....Apple's still doing business with/in Russia?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a shame but it seems most companies only pretended to cut ties.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty much every brand, that was doing business there before, does it the exact same way, but under a shell company name. Capitalism doesn't give a fuck who's doing what, and how wrong it is

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I remember an article from last year or so that German washing machines ended up being sold to Russia through Kazakhstan and other places where they stripped the microchips to repurpose them in their missiles.

https://time.com/6226484/russia-appliance-imports-weapons/

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lots of western companies are. Not everything is subject to sanctions — the U.S. government still buys uranium from Russia and there’s cooperation on space launches — but even the companies that tried to divest for moral reasons found it challenging, to say the least. The ones who tried often had their assets essentially stolen or sold for pennies on the dollar to a Putin loyalist oligarch.

I’m not sure what Apple is doing there besides having the App Store. They did stop all exports so any new Apple products there are smuggled and probably way more expensive. On balance, I think it’s better keeping the App Store and software updates available to Russians. Some dissidents and journalists use Apple products too and you don’t want their devices left insecure.

probably way more expensive

Nope. iPhone 15 pro max 128 gb could be bought in Moscow for 109490 руб, which is $15 higher than in the US.

Before the war Apple had a weird price policy in Russia when they just multiplied the official US price by the factor of 100 to get the price in roubles. It resulted in a +30-60% increase in prices.

So... the war has actually dropped the price for the Apple products dramatically for regular russians. The only problem with the Apple products the war has introduced is that you can't pay in AppStore

See how iPhone sales peak in Kazakhstan and Georgia after the war and sanctions. Does apple work in Russia? No, they just ship their shit to Georgia and don't ask why every Georgian needs 2 iphones and one MacBook every year.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

God forbid Apple take a 0.01% hit to their profits to allow the flow of factual information to people stuck in Russia under a monstrous dictator.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (15 children)

The vast majority of russians support imperialism and a majority hold genocidal views (they would never openly agree to this, but on an outcome basis they do support eradication of Ukrainian culture and not only).

Even to this day, every russian with a smartphone has access to uncensored youtube available within 10 secs on their phone.

Not saying what apple did was right, just pointing out the "lack of factual information" narrative is largely incorrect. It's more a lack of respect for the rights others, nihilism and overwhelming supremacism; no VPN or technology is going to solve this.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about the people happily living in self-delusion. We have plenty of those in the US too. Free information channels are still important and can be a crushing loss to the people who do care about reality.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is different people in different countries. No question about that. And free information channels are definitely very important. My argument is that in the case of russia, this factors don't really come into play in a meaningful way.

Information channels even after the full scale invasion are available and easy to access, it was less restrictive before Feb 24 2022, but the difference is somewhat marginal. Access to information isn't going to magically change the imperialist, supremacist mindset of the overwhelming majority of russians.

It's not an access to information problem, it's a social and cultural problem. I've lived there for 10 years (in addition to living a decade in north america and many years in asia), the imperialist/genocidal mindset has survived 3 regimes (Tsarism, USSR, authoritarian capitalism) with very different technological currents and economic structure profiles. It's not going away just like that.

Full disclosure: I am Ukrainian, but I would argue you can come to the same conclusions by taking a critical look at their history, current attitudes (even among the "liberal" opposition) and broad worldview.

Just wanted to share my thoughts. Re-reading my posts, I think I come off a bit more pushy than I wanted to.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not advocating for free information because i think it'll make a significant difference in current geopolitics or change how things would have gone. I simply view it as a human right. But I do think it is particularly important in a country that is in the process of violently suppressing increasingly important information (e.g. who the terrorist attackers were so Russia isnt in a blind rage against Ukrainian "butchers"). These small drips of reality into the information space do temper the level of dishonesty Russia can get away with. They aren't quite yet to North Korean levels of mass delusion and if a tiny portion of Apple's profit help spare people from that misery then it is a small price to pay for what little seed of hope that can sow for the future. Other countries have been expected to endure much more to deal with trade restrictions etc. so it's a bit much that Apple can't even do this tiny thing.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Agreed regarding access to information being a human right.

I was also surprised that Apple went with this and didn't just ignore them. This is not China after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The vast majority of russians support imperialism and a majority hold genocidal views (they would never openly agree to this, but on an outcome basis they do support eradication of Ukrainian culture and not only).

That's a major simplification. The fact that russians do not stand against a genocidal war doesn't mean that the vast majority do support it.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I disagree. While my statement did not include any kind of elaboration. This is not a simplification.

At the very least a strong majority (and I am being conservative) support the annexation of Ukrainian territories and elimination of Ukrainian culture and language in areas under occupation. On the quantitative side this is confirmed by various polling initiatives that use different methodologies (including in-direct polling with attempts to estimate preference falsification).

On the qualitative side, you can look at genocides committed in the last ~100 years by the russians (and there are several, includes less well known ones) and review the attitudes towards these crimes among various socio-political groups (not necessarily in a purely quantitative manner).

I have one interesting anecdote. Currently among the "liberal" russian opposition there is a big debate around a 3 hour YT series about the 90s in russia.

One bit topic that was completely excluded was the actions of russians in Chechnya; the creators (Navalniy's organization) said it was out of scope.

During their intervention in Chechnya in the 90s, they killed approximately 5% of the civilian population; it would be like if 7.5 million russian civilians were killed.

Don't get me wrong, a relatively small % of russians would openly admit to that they support extermination of Ukrainian identity (still 10s of millions). But even among the reminder, there is a strong undercurrent of supremacism, a desire of expansion that de facto is support for genocide.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've been recently banned for putting links that lead to russian sites, so I'll reference the sources by name in italic.

On the quantitative side this is confirmed by various polling initiatives that use different methodologies (including in-direct polling with attempts to estimate preference falsification).

AFAIK it is neither confirmed nor refuted. I don't know how one would interpret results where 91-93% just refuse to talk to a sociologist and 4-5% more abort the interview when asked about something related to the war. That's the results by Russian Field, one of a few agencies that publish these numbers. They do interpretation of these results, but they differ from month to month: you can numbers from Feb 2024 to prove your point, I can put numbers from May 2024 to prove mine.

On the qualitative side, you can look at genocides committed in the last ~100 years by the russians (and there are several, includes less well known ones) and review the attitudes towards these crimes among various socio-political groups

That's a bold point implying that history defines the attitudes for a whole nation for decades. There were a lot of atrocities made in the name of Russia in the Baltic states, Belarus, Ukraine, towards Circassians, Germans, Tatar and Georgians (probably forgot something). But for some reasons, russians want to exterminate only Ukrainian identity, conquer Baltics and befriend Georgia and Germany. That's a political/propaganda surface, not a historical one.

Talking about qualitative research, there's a publicsociologylab group that conducts interesting narrative research. Their last project is concerned with the view on the war from a non-central city. They conclude that people do ignore the atrocities and view them as something that is alien to them. The only question they ask is whether it is worth it to go to war for $10k + $3k/mo.

I hope that I was able to draw a picture where Russia is not a country of pests that should be exterminated. It's a complex evil system that could be built anywhere in the world, even in Ukraine or the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what exactly do you think a russian citizen can do to opose the war? Are you aware of the people protesting with blank peaces of paper being taken away? Or even high ranking people "falling from the balcony"

Do you also think that North Koreans support and enjoy their way of living?

There is a long way from not having much choice in oposing something to actually supporting it...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] uienia@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

More like greedy and nihilistic, like all corporations.

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Another argument for alternative appstores

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago

Another argument for Android.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago
[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

As a result, anyone wanting to access blocked sites from Russia is forced to use a VPN, a protective tunnel that encrypts internet traffic and changes a user’s IP address.

I hate how media describes VPN. It doesn’t “change your IP address” but rather makes your traffic appear to come from a remote endpoint when configured to do so.

I use VPNs all the time that don’t “change my IP address” at all.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (5 children)

They do change the source IP from the perspective of the host receiving your connection.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I’m of the opinion that Apple services ought to be geofenced out of Russia entirely.

Google too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apple is a shit-hole company, if you support them, you deserve all the wrath headed your way.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Posted from my Lenovo running Microsoft Windows 11

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure there's a quid pro quo.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›