Technology

58083 readers

3134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-1

Solid: Your data, your choice. (solidproject.org)

submitted 5 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Advancing Web standards to empower individuals and groups.

Curious what others think of this? This was linked in Tim Berners-Lee's open letter on the state of the web at 35yrs.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some interesting points, and some things I disagree with.

Firstly it's annoying he keeps calling it his idea and trying to enforce this concept that the current internet needs to align with his original goals. That's stupid and ignores that things will go where they go, he can't control them.

So his first point about centralisation being an issue isn't that big a grievance. But his second point rings true - the issues around our data and advertising have grown significantly and the Web is getting much worse as a result.

I actually think the solution is just government needs to step in and regulate it, along the lines of what the EU is doing. Realistically I think that's the only solution that'll help. Doing some grassroots movement and hoping it picks up steam is just unrealistic. Like looking at Lemmy and Mastadon - they're great but at this pace they'll never take over the other giants in the space. You need someone to step in and force the change.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree with most of your comment so I'll focus on details that I disagree with.

Centralisation is an issue because it enables enshittification. A centralised system is always controlled by someone; and once that someone is at odds with the users, the users need to choose between 1) ditching the system completely, or 2) sucking it up. Decentralisation gives you a third option, to ditch only the parts of the system controlled by that someone.

Decentralisation does introduce additional complexity; I think that's why Mastodon and Lemmy have such slow adoption. However I also believe that this resistance against enshittification should allow the Fediverse as a whole to retain users better.

I fully agree that governments need to regulate the issues around our data and advertisement. But it won't be enough, because corporations (and people, in general) are damn great at finding loopholes at legislation, or newer exploits.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Centralisation is something we see in other facets of our society and it fails there too. Look for instance at the grass roots movement to have a third party in the US government. The numbers aren't there even though people agree the 2 party system is broken. So you're correct that centralisation is an issue, but I think op is also correct that grass roots movements don't have any teeth in the internet space, and an equally large or larger power has to step in and in this case legislate. Not that it seems you were arguing the other point exactly. Just that I think the two points are kind of entwined together.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

I agree that relying solely on grassroots is bad; larger groups of people are specially hard to coordinate towards common goals. However, as @higgsboson@dubvee.org mentioned there's more than grassroots backing Solid up. And, even for the Fediverse, it seems that Mastodon caught some positive attention of government entities, like Switzerland.

So, perhaps that's a bit of wishful thinking, but the teeth might eventually grow, even if they aren't there from the start.

Regarding your example: it's tricky for me to talk about USA's government because I'm not from USA. For me the main issue seems to be the use of winner-take-all representation perpetuating the two-parties system; if that's correct you'd need more than just a social movement to have a third party, you'd need structural changes. [Don't trust what I said here, please. From the outside, details are always lost.]

[–] peak_dunning_krueger@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Let's be real here: They are trying to create a "platform"^TM and "ecosystem"^TM to later wall off, embrace, extend, extinguish or otherwise enshittify.

There is no actual problem they are solving.

It's venture capital bait.

https://solidproject.org/TR/protocol#abstract