this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
500 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

11161 readers
2881 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Design is fine, is just user error"
- every designer ever

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 week ago

I see the problem, you forgot to clear your browser cache before evolving. closes ticket

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Efficiency is making the same structure work for dual purposes.....like garbage disposal + procreation.

[–] kraftpudding@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think you procreate if you stick it up the garbage disposal though.

[–] Wrufieotnak 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Garbage comes in different states of matter...

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I still don't think you procreate if you stick it up the garbage disposal.

[–] ftbd 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It’s more than just efficient, personally I think it feels pretty good too

[–] Oijkuij@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know what the alternatives are, right? either we have two mouths, or we speak with our nostrils and the silent, gaping hole below only unhinges for the consumption of organic matter.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Good luck speaking when they are clogged up. :/

Maybe the nostrils should be redesigned too.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe Voldermort was onto something?

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

That's how they kill the germs....very clever really.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Silent? No no no. The gaping hole makes loud chewing noises while the nostrils merily chat away in a sing-songy, whistly voice!

[–] servobobo@feddit.nl 19 points 1 week ago

Last change made by Evolution, commit message "ehh good enough TODO fix in next release", 500 million years ago

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

Works well enough in most cases #wontfix

[–] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

identical unmarked doors

Bro I don't think you are supposed to look at it to determine which way food goes

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder what the implications would be, if every body part were labeled (including innards).

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It would raise some pretty interesting philosophical questions.

[–] ArdMacha@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is what allows you to hold your breath underwater

[–] other_cat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

All you can eat sinuses

[–] Dirac@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Sounds like we should optimize that.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Thinking about how smell might have developed is kind of cool. Some mutation allowing cells to detect smell (something modern science is kind of puzzled by) then just sending those signals to the brain and saying, you figure it out. I'd bet there is some other property of matter that exists that we have no ability to detect.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't smell just particulate matter hitting receptors not dissimilar to how taste receptors send taste signals to the brain? I thought science had this stuff nailed down now?

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what they theorize. How do you prove it?

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Science shit?

I dont know....but I wouldn't say that's a good reason to doubt it, for example I don't know how they proved black holes exist but they seem pretty confident.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Ok, if it's just particles how does it distinguish the particles on a molecular level. This is important shit. The closest science can do is gas chromatography and that's an instrument which exists in any reputable lab. Also, using gas chromatography for this a far cry from the simple function of our sense of smell which can distinguish scents just by simply introducing a fragrence.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm misreading your tone, but I'm not trying to argue with you - I'm genuinely curious about this and if you have superior knowledge I'm open!

My understanding from a quick skim of Wikipedia citations suggests we understand what's involved (particles and receptors) but the actual mechanism around encoding of signals seems to be theory.

We also can't teach a computer to think, but we still have quite a good idea of how it works.

https://pca.st/episode/835428d6-e13b-4f1b-866c-de9b6a74d660

If your interested this is a good episode of Unexplainable. They can do better then me.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe the receptor cell responds to a particular part of the molecule in question. Artificial flavourings and scents have identical (or similar enough) parts to trigger the same response, but are otherwise different molecules.

I think someone said the number of combinations for a key and lock receptor was insurmountable. Don't quote me.