this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
259 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3183 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 95 points 1 week ago (41 children)

Just remember, America. You voted for what's coming. You asked for it and so you have no one to blame but yourselves.

They told you exactly what they are planning to do.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The problem isn't that America voted for this. Only 21% of the country voted for Trump.

The problem is that America didn't vote at all.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That only makes them more blameworthy, not less.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Unless we understand why they didn't vote it's just going to keep happening

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think most didn’t vote because they are apathetic, ill-informed morons with the attention span of a gnat. They don’t understand inflation, tariffs, deflation, international relations, trade, renewable energy, oil production, gas prices, vaccines, healthcare, or much of anything else. They also don’t care to learn about how anything works. It’s not like the last chapter of the history book on the United States is going to blame the pro-democracy candidate for not doing enough to appeal to a public that was too lazy to continue living in a democracy. They have access to more educational resources than any humans in history and they just ignore it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that's the case then we are well and truly fucked because that's not changing without significant education investment, and Trump is going to get rid of the Department of Education.

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I believe we are well and truly fucked.

Education and critical thinking is lacking in the majority of the electorate and the trend is that we elect leaders that reinforce that instead of mitigate it. Defunding education doesn't improve this situation, and I feel we hit a tipping point where we might not be able to get these skills back in the curriculum going forward.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Humanity in general is fucked. This isn't a uniquely American problem. The growth of entertainment and technology has broken our primitive monkey brains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This time, the election wasn't about dems or reps, it was about democracy or fascism. If you didn't vote, means you are ok with fascism.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or just incredibly ignorant. I think we vastly overestimate the political intelligence of the people in this country.

There are a metric fuckton of apathetic people that are "too busy" to give a shit about politics unfortunately. Hell just look at the articles after the election that called out Google searches for "did Biden drop out?" spiking on election day.

These people are too busy watching whatever braindead Netflix bullshit, or just not watching anything at all to know what's even going on.

[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That can't excuse them.

Even if they lived in a bubble, it's impossible that they never heard anything about all the orange turd rants and how dangerous he is. Not voting for any reason makes you an accomplice of whoever wins, because your apathy means you are ok with whatever goes, including fascism.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That might be correct but it's not going to get more people to vote, which is what we need to happen.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But when you look at what people said in the exit poll interviews, most were not voting for fascism when they voted for Trump. They were voting on the illusion that he would be better for their pocket book.

In exit polls, people actually hated Trump and his extremism significantly more, but they’re hurting so much financially that they were willing to roll the dice on his “I’ll take you back to 2017-19” bullshit.

He go in the same way other strongmen often get into power, claims of economic populism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s your right to point fingers and blame people, but if you want to get them to vote and bring them over to your side, that is historically not been the best motivator.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

I think there’s truth to this. The Democratic party has to engage with people in good faith and learn what it’s important for them and why they voted the way they did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The people who abstained from voting, made their vote. When fascism is on the line, you don't get to sit out and be absolved. They've signed on for everything that is to come.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can't count people under the voting age and you need to add the people who didn't vote because it means they supported whoever got in power. 170m registered voters in 2020 so must be similar. 43% of registered voters voted for him, 40% for Harris, 1% others, that's 16% who didn't vote that we can add to Trump's number... But that's just registered voters and doesn't count eligible ones who didn't register!

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not taking a vote, just like postponing or not taking a decision, is equivalent to taking one, so here we are.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Only about a 4th of us...a fourth voted counter and the rest didn't or can't vote....

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't ask for it. I voted for Harris. If what you said they are going to do is the truth, you'll suffer the consequences too, and will be just as guilty as I am.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I voted against trump. Why am I to blame?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

They told you exactly what they are planning to do.

Which is why half of the country voted against Trump, and why a lot of the other half voted for Trump. He told us exactly what he was planning to do.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Everybody is warning us of the impact of the election. They've been warning us for years.

The problem is that Americans stood up and either said "We know. We just don't care.", or "We know. We want it that way."

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

After briefly speaking to one of my younger (white, male, most likely straight, but turns out he's prob an "enlightened centrist") co-workers earlier today, it seems like there are people who just don't believe it can happen.

He told me that "both sides have their propaganda" when I asked if he's read Project 2025. I wanted to scream.

The conversation literally ended with me telling him that this has happened before. He said, yeah, but not here. I was like, we're not special. Such a disappointing conversation. Ruined my day/night. Literally used the "it will never happen here" line.

This is a man with a STEM degree. He's not stupid.

I think there are a lot of people who are in for a shock when the shit really starts hitting the fan.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can have tons of degrees and still be stupid.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Confirmed I knew a man who worked doing advanced particle research at cern but who also voted for the Tory party. In the words of a wise man, ‘that’s the dumbest smart guy I know’. People are retarded and it’s extremely annoying.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Then you've got the "Did Joe Biden step down?" crowd just completely oblivious lol.

In the aftermath the number of fuckwits I saw not voting or voting against their own interests has been insane.

Socialists sitting out because of Gaza.

Black women complaining Trump won but not voting.

Working class woman whose husband is in a union and he himself voted Harris; whose son is gay... Yep, she voted Trump.

I'm so tired of trying to drag along stupid people.

22% of America said Fuck America, and thus we were fucked.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Kamala Harris was given an assignment that no other person in American history was given — to construct a presidential campaign in 90-100 days with absolutely no expectation or anticipation that she would be called to that assignment

Canada's federal election process is 36-50 days, or half that.

I agree with most of what was written, but I wanted to point out that countries put forth a scalable platform every 4-5 years in half the time. It's a bag-drive, but it's the timeline.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Before Last Week Tonight, John Oliver was on a podcast called The Bugle and I can remember him bemoaning how long US elections were compared to Britain. I wonder how he feels about covering our bullshit all the time now, I imagine similar to the exhaustion that led Jon to mostly retire

[–] doc@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

If all candidates are on the same timeline then I agree. That's not the case here. 100 days vs literal years of planning.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Yes and no, the official campaign is a month and a half but the campaign starts way before that. Also the leaders are chosen way ahead of the campaign, Harris became the candidate 3 months ahead of the election.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago

If you get another vote.

load more comments
view more: next ›