Nintendo

18176 readers

47 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

No NSFW content.
No hate speech or personal attacks.
No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
No console wars or PC elitism.
Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

Other Gaming Communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

slimerancher@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemdro.id

picandocodigo@lemmy.world

187

Nintendo won't use generative AI in its first-party games (www.tweaktown.com)

submitted 1 month ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/nintendo@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

A rare "Nintendo did a good thing" moment.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

More of a “doesn’t plan to do a bad thing” moment since they technically didn’t do anything.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nintendo is actually pretty good for it's employees, and at developing games. The main reason people don't like it is how strongly they try to protect their IP.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I actually think this might be an extension of them protecting their IP. Afterall, the IP of plenty of other companies has been mined for use training Generative AI LLM's.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is it, pretty much. I don't agree with people who are aggressively against Nintendo in general, especially in cases like the MIG-Switch, but at the same time, they operate in such a bizarre grey area. It's unbelievably stupid to both prevent software preservation, and not allow legal ways to obtain those titles

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Tbf when it comes to actually developing games they're good at what they do

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The funniest thing they could do now is make a really shitty Wario game using only generative A.I.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Honestly, if any game could make good use of generative AI it'd be wario ware.

[–] corus_kt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Nintendo saw Squeenix release Portopia and Symbiogenesis and adapted their plans

[+] JoShmoe@ani.social -38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why is this a thing? I’m not for generative ai writing code and making art. I just feel like they’re shooting themselves in the foot here. I love that mod that basically acts as an impromptu dungeon master when you communicate with NPCs.

[–] xytaruka@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's your right to enjoy that and there's a reason it's a mod, generative is too unpredictable for a company that focuses on high quality family friendly content.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What mod for what game are you talking about? Is the mod just writing flavor fluff or is it weaving in important information?

If it is the former, I don't care for it. I don't want to know that farmer John had a good crop of turnips. It is just filler fluff that does not build on the setting but simply makes it look busy for the sake of being busy.

If it is the latter, I would think that there is a risk that the AI NPC conveys information in a hard to understand or misleading way and players would have a hard time understanding what to do.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 0 points 1 month ago

Its a Skyrim mod, or a collection of mods. I never used it myself.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's more like a quality control thing I guess. Generated content is going to be derivitive by its nature so banning it internally is forcing the devs to be creative.