this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
933 points (96.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5754 readers
2436 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Practically speaking, what is supposed to be done about it? It's all protected by the first amendment. Even if they were to somehow pass a new kind of "fairness" legislation in a future blue wave, the stacked SCOTUS will strike it down.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They could at least try to end corporate personhood.. make it so that corporations are not protected by the 1st amendment and don't get free speech... Anything they blast out needs to be scrutinized and any misinformation needs to have heavy penalties... Sure the actual person saying the thing is protected, but the corporations pushing it out or allowing it to go out through them get crushed under fines... This would require a party that is not working for the oligarchy/donors though

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They could at least try to end corporate personhood… make it so that corporations are not protected by the 1st amendment and don’t get free speech…

You'd need a supermajority to amend the constitution, and that is completely unrealistic.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

It wouldn't be easy, but I think people, especially young people, want to vote for people who will actually fight... Over and over as long as it takes

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Bold of them to assume there's going to be a Democratic party.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay. Am I to assume this means they have to do interviews on fox News? What the fuck are they supposed to do about this? They clearly know it

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They need to come to terms!!

I've been coming to terms and I never see them there!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but it's not.

its about 20 million voters throwing a tantrum and fucking us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jawa21@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago

Anyone with an AM radio has known this for decades.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So Dems don't turnout to vote and this is the Republican propaganda machines fault? The day the Dems actually take accountability for their continual fuckups is the day I might vote for them again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It was never a tenable solution.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›