this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
238 points (91.3% liked)

World News

31477 readers
680 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2904990

Link to the article

The Chinese government has introduced a slew of new measures designed to tighten its grip on lucrative natural resources used in everything from electric cars to wind turbines. In a list released by the country's State Council on Saturday, Beijing declared that rare earth metals are the property of the state and warned "no organization or person may encroach on or destroy rare-earth resources." From Oct. 1, when the rules come into force, the government will operate a rare earth traceability database to ensure it can control the extraction, use and export of the metals. China currently produces around 60 percent of the world's rare earth metals, and is the origin of around 90 percent of refined rare earths on the market. Advertisement

Beijing has already prohibited exports of rare earth refining and magnet manufacturing technologies. In January, it banned the export of gallium and germanium, both highly sought after by the computer-chip industry. Fears that China is looking to exert control over the industry, and could disrupt critical technology, automotive and renewable energy supply chains, have sparked a race to shore up supplies from alternative suppliers. Both the U.S. and the EU have launched efforts to procure rare earths at home and abroad, including in Vietnam, Brazil and Australia. A year ago, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced construction of the first large-scale rare earth refinery outside of Asia, located in Estonia. She said the move would "bolster European resilience and security of supply."

A 2022 analysis from the European Parliament warned that over-reliance on monopolistic suppliers was a major risk for Europe. "The EU imports 93 percent of its magnesium from China, 98 percent of its borate from Turkey, and 85 percent of its niobium from Brazil. Russia produces 40 percent of the world's palladium," it said. "The latter is a reminder of the strategic implications of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the need for the EU to prepare for an increasingly uncertain world."

The EU has launched a probe into anti-competitive trading allegations against the Chinese electric vehicle market, which benefits from heavy government subsidies and preferential access to essential rare earth metals. Earlier this month, the two sides agreed they would host consultations in order to try and resolve the standoff.

That last paragraph really is so damning. It is admitting the superiority of China’s central planning and how it is being used to actually improve society. ”But at what cost?”

Well, apparently the cost is that shares of China’s largest rare earth mineral mining firm have gone up 5% since the announcement. China proving socialists right every single day and absolutely crushing the capitalist development speedrun challenge. It’s genuinely hilarious that the development plan of China runs basically like what I’ll describe below, and capitalist nations are just completely incapable of stopping it from happening because the power of capital is greater than the power of their states.

porky-happy “hmmm yes, today I will invest in the Chinese rare earth mineral market. Since China controls 90% of global production and all of the infrastructure is in place, all I have to do is bring my money, tech, and expertise with me and I’ll carve myself some serious profit! Easy money!”

xigma-male “Ahh yes thank you for the help developing our mining industry/technology Mr. Foreign Capital. We appreciate your business and you had a great run, but unfortunately for you we have nationalized your mineral resources. The extractive capitalism will now stop. Feel free to reinvest elsewhere or compete with us on the global market tho :)”

porky-scared-flipped ”China is nationalizing its rare earth minerals, but at what cost? We need to ban China from–“

porky-happy ”Wait omg is that another investment opportunity in China where I can bring in my capital/technology/expertise to make some money? Hell yeah, where do I sign?”

Rinse and repeat

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 56 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You know what?

GOOD!

Every nation should be doing that.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 44 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Seriously. Those materials are essential and necessary for growth. Allowing some capitalist douchebag to hoard it all and make profits from it is a national security threat.

Let the country build and the country will grow.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Not just that, but get fair value for the material.

Not how companies got basically carte blanche to extract however much they can get and then claim no profit when taxes come around.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 3 days ago

And then on top we provide these with parasites with transfers from federal budget to develop their mines and fields... and they get to price gouge on the back end.

NO money for anything else tho

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Dude, the frequency with which people are accepting this screenshot of a headline as a statement of fact is frightening. Please read about what they actually announced rather than falling for what is essentially propaganda

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 56 points 4 days ago (2 children)

African and South American countries with lithium and cobalt deposits, pay attention!

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

He would've turned 99 yesterday

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Africa? Isn't China already all over it?

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Belts and Roads. Belts and Roads...

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

You mean how they keep forgiving billions of dollars in loans that they're using to build infrastructure and industrial capacity?

How terrible!

Contest that with the IMF, which bleeds countries dry until they have to auction off all their state assets and impose brutal austerity onto the people in order to repay their loans.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Uh, China doesn't forgive the loans, they seize the assets, that's the whole point of debt colonialism. They can't colonize by force and no one trusts them to host their military bases, so they use debt to build a port or whatever and then when the host country can't keep up on exhorbitant payments they take the port and ta-da, they've expanded their geopolitical reach.

China is in a hyper-imperialist push right now.

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I still wonder how Brautigam & Rithmire managed to slip that one into the neoliberal Atlantic; it seems they’ve never been invited back.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago

Uh, China doesn’t forgive the loans, they seize the assets, that’s the whole point of debt colonialism.

Show me these supposed seizures; you’re talking out your ass. Imperial core corporate media are projecting their own states’ neocolonialism onto China, and you’re accepting their propaganda like a good Council on Foreign Relations consumer.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (16 children)

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/03/28/economy/china-rescue-lending-belt-and-road-study-intl-hnk

China has forgiven billions in loans

Also literally read Lenin's definition of imperialism before you start saying bullshit like "taking over assets in another country is imperialism"

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago

Amp links are bad mmk

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You're so blinded by this lust you have for China that you forgot to read a goddamn thing about this besides the headline. What China's doing is intentionally cutting production to prop up rare earth mineral prices. They're purposefully making these minerals more expensive so the businesses that refine them can stay in business. You might recall similar business models from the Texas Railroad Commission and later OPEC, both regarding petroleum supply controls.

Here's an article if you care to know anything at all about what's actually happening lmao

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So what’s your issue here?

If prices are falling low enough that it’s causing financial issues for some of these companies that would tell you that there’s too much supply relative to demand so you’d obviously slow production. By your own post you’re saying it’s so the refineries can stay in business, that would mean the price is too low for it to be economically viable.

If you let things continue eventually one would go bankrupt if they don’t slow production so one way or another the supply would come down.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dude, did you read anything at all that OP wrote above? That China is imposing these restrictions makes economic sense, but OP is celebrating it like some socialist/communist victory over the West lmao

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The fact that the government recognized the issue and stepped in to take control of the industry in order to prevent issues is a win compared to how things are allowed to just burn out and fail potentially causing larger issues in for the economy in other countries.

Most countries wouldnt be able to say no to capital and it would meant the resources would continue to cheaply get extracted at the expense of the long term health of the counties industry.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The US, which is what I assume you're talking about, has had supply controls on a ton of commodities, so I'm not sure what you're comparing to here. Just one example among many, the Texas Railroad Commission.

[–] Tak@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

If only it cranked up the supply for housing

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's wrong with OPEC supply controls? No one owes you cheap oil.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

I didn't give any opinion on OPEC being good or bad, but it's certainly not some socialist utopia like OP is trying to pretend this is

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Image posts should be banned on all news communities. Just post the link to the article. We don't need a screenshot of the headline.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Questionable news plus four paragraphs of highly partisan commentary

Even Reddit news is superior, and that place is a shit hole

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Didn't a Scandinavian country recently find rare earth deposits that were twice or triple as big as China's?

[–] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

I believe the US has significant deposits as well. But its one thing having deposits and another to have the manufacturing capacity to refine it. Because the cost of labour is cheaper in china the "west" decided to import it from there. It also has the added benefit for the west of exporting environmental concern and to have a boggey man to point to when it comes to implementing green energy. ("Look we can implent what we can, but as long China is being a polluter, it doesn't matter anyway)

[–] romp_2_door@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

based china

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

Woooo sodium-ion batteries.

This just forces the west to speed up research on alternative solutions to those materials. So win win really.

load more comments
view more: next ›