doubtingtammy

joined 4 months ago
[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The article is a worth a read, answers the question in the first couple paragraphs, and isn't a site flooded with ads. You're just saving people from learning more than the answer to the headline

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 18 points 14 hours ago

Me explaining how HRT changed my thighs

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 3 points 22 hours ago

It's nice to see a liberal refrain from calling someone they disagree with Russian/Chinese

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

And here's to the cops of Mississippi They're chewing their tobacco As they lock the prison door And their bellies bounce inside them When they knock you to the floor No, they don't like taking prisoners In their private little wars And behind their broken badges There are murderers and more

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not posting this to make fun of Mississippi. I just think it's telling that the opposite of "Mississippi Goddam" (Nina Simone civil rights song) is "thank god for Mississippi" (ghoulish joke at the expense of Poor and Black misssissipians)

 

"Thank God for Mississippi" is an adage used in the United States, particularly in the South, that is generally used when discussing rankings of U.S. states.[1] Examples include rankings of educational achievement, business opportunities,[2] obesity rates,[3] overall health,[4] the poverty rate,[5] life expectancy, or other criteria of the quality of life or government in the 50 U.S. states.[6][7][8]

Since the U.S. state of Mississippi commonly ranks at or near the bottom of such rankings, residents of other states also ranking near the bottom may say, "Thank God for Mississippi", since the presence of that state in 50th place spares them of being ranked last.[9] The phrase is in use even among state government officials[10][11] and journalists,[12][13][14][15] though occasionally with a slight modification

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 days ago

Apartheid regime

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Right, but the supreme Court would just find that law unconstitutional. Or ignore the implicit meaning.

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Well There's your problem just did an episode on that https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K4yCXIZ32lk

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They take getting caught seriously, not the stuff they get caught at.

Wut. I'm not sure if this is a distinction without a difference, or a subtle distinction that I need a better grasp on continental philosophy to comprehend.

It's like saying a state doesn't take murder seriously - they take getting caught seriously. It's technically true if you parse it a certain way, but ultimately meaningless

this kind of thing is not bad because it endangered people’s lives, it’s bad because it makes them look bad and might impact their exports

Something can be bad for multiple reasons. Also, there's multiple actors here. The operators of the state-owned enterprise have different incentives than the regulators

 

I recently got a Sony prs 600 e reader from 2009. The battery is at the end of its life (It lasts about 3 days with heavy reading, and a couple weeks without reading). No backlight, no Wi-Fi, just an SD card that I can load epub files and small PDFs. The screen is slow and the contrast isn't the best. The "touch screen" is the old resistive type where you really need to press with your nail or a stylus. Despite all those flaws, it's fantastic. It's just good enough for reading books.

I read with large text so I don't even need to put on glasses, and it's easier to read than an actual book. Combined with Anna's archive, I'm reading more than I ever have before. No Wi-Fi nd slow screen make the experience feel closer to an actual book than a smartphone. It's great to just have a device do one thing without distractions popping up every minute.

It's all old technology, but it's so rare to see anyone with an e-reader. Probably because they're still expensive and designed to microtransact the fuck out of you.

So do you think there could be a simple open source e reader? I see pine64 is making the "pinenote", but it's still just the developer version, it's expensive, doesn't have an sd card, and looks like it's trying to be a lot more than an reader. Maybe it'll come down in cost, or they'll release a simpler version? The biggest obstacle for making an e-reader seems to be the screen, so maybe the pinenote's screen could become something of a standard.

Or maybe I'm overthinking it, because there's already so many old Kindles and nooks out there that could be improved with a new battery and maybe new firmware too.

Thoughts?

view more: next ›