this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53843 readers
567 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My gluetun VPN keeps failing the health check after running for a few hours. I found that some had fixed this by changing the update period to a shorter interval, and this worked for a while for me as well. But for the last 24h or so, it keeps failing after a few hours.

How can i fix this?

docker compose:

gluetun log:

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If all else fails you can overwrite the healthcheck command or even disable it altogether.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

lol that second one is a terrible idea

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't you want to turn it off if it doesn't work reliably? I struggle to see the point of keeping around a health check that behaves erratically.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I suppose it’s a personal choice of where you set the bar for your systems.

Personally, as a software engineer who’s designed and built a lot of systems over the course of my career: nope - not if you want to just set it and forget it, that is. Which I do. And yes, most of the systems I’ve built professionally aren’t to that standard (mostly due to time constraints), which has consistently frustrated me, but you gotta be a little bit zen about stuff you don’t have complete ownership over.

Maybe your tolerance for manual intervention is higher than mine, but in terms personal standards, I don’t consider a system to be “done” until it’s configured to to handle itself resiliently and recoverably in all but the most catastrophic situations (I.e. basically, a hardware fault, or some sort of fairly serious upstream infrastructure failure).

All that said: YMMV. It’s a personal preference, and I know my standards would be considered abnormally strict by some.