Here’s the correct way:
- Take a photo of your screen with a camera.
- Have the film developed or print that photo if you have a digital camera.
- Make necessary highlights with a pen.
- Scan the paper.
- Upload the file here.
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
-10 points (36.8% liked)
Showerthoughts
30023 readers
678 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- Avoid politics
- 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
- 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
- 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
~~5. Upload the file here.~~
-
Open a new Word document, embed the scanned image
-
Print as PDF
-
Upload the file here
I swear if I get another Word document with nothing more than a screenshot pasted inside I’m going to run off a cliff. Everyday at work. Microsoft must love this.
This guy boomers lol.
I've had someone at work do that. They printed an email, highlighted and wrote in their responses, and sent it back as a .jpg.
That was just the sort version. There are even more convoluted ways some consider to be unnatural.
Did I do this right 😂
White on black, perfection
🤣🤣🤣
This is the way.
Power consumption? Takes more power to make a net connection to go to another site, and takes a LOT longer.
Plus, following links drives traffic and provides even more tracking.
Just copy paste the smartfunny words. 99% of the time I'm not interested in the nickname of the person nor their avatar, so you source-link only because it's nice. :)
Maybe, but image posts drive more engagement than text ones. You can see on !lowqualityfacts@lemmy.zip that the text posts, which are no worse LQFs than any other ones IMO, score noticeably lower.
I like sites / Lemmy frontends that provide some kind of 'teaser' for text posts (they also show a bit of the post's body in the main feed), meaning you can often see both the feed line and the punchline for a post without going into it (it works well for 'dad jokes' for example). But the default frontend - lemmy-ui - doesn't do that, so it hobbles the potential of text posts.
I think a hybrid approach is better, have a screenshot and a link to the source too. with a screenshot of a post on a whatever site I don't not to figure out which privacy frontend is working right now every single time.
Copying the source can lead to doxxing, brigading, threats of violence, and other trouble
Linking to the source seems more boomerish than screenshotting to me. Boomers don't know how to screenshot, and it's more cumbersome to have to go to a new site.
This post is pretty boomerish.