this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
-1 points (0.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43707 readers
1492 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not saying the worst, otherwise I would need to include the star wars sequels or transformers movies... Just some really dumb movie that somehow got praised.

For me has to be Ready Player One. That movie message is so "uhuh" obvious that is stupid, the whole nerd that saves the world in a thing that otherwise would be useless to know in real life... The so over the top evil gaming corporation. The whole 80s and 90s movies and games references get old after half an hour... And it's so pandering towards the geeks and nerds, they really want the viewer feeling really cool for knowing that is the Shining hallway, or that is a Monty python reference... Or look a GUNDAM! YOU'RE SO COOL FOR COLLECTING THOSE GUN PLA! Look we have also overwatch and halo in the background! You're so cool modern gamer!

Also the obviously attractive "nerd" hacker girl that thinks she's ugly and deformed for having a small hard to see red tint in one side of her pretty face... Cmon man. In no universe anyone would think that actress is ugly.

And the message at the end is so hilarious: Look man, you're cool for getting these references and being a real gamer is cool, but go outside more!

Is like the creators have no self awareness.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

La La Land. Musicals are already on thin ice, but a musical about some arrogant, self obsessed people complaining about how hard it is trying to be (and ultimately succeeding in being) successful?? UGH. Shut it all down.

[โ€“] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Right?! "Oh no we are so brilliant and talented and smoking hot, but the world won't just give us success on a silver platter and now that we made our dreams come true we miss being together".

[โ€“] mukt@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It is too early to say Oppenheimer?

[โ€“] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. Bombastic. Felt like it missed the whole point of Oppenheimer's moral dilemma

[โ€“] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm biased but I thought it was pretty clear with portraying Truman as an unambiguously bad guy and Oppenheimer as decent but failing at a critical moment and then regretting it later

I've always imagined his moral dilemma was knowing that (after the Nazis were defeated) going ahead with the bomb was wrong, but wanting to do it anyway - because they had become so invested in the idea, and wanted to see if they could.

[โ€“] Toribor@corndog.social 1 points 4 months ago

I'd been pretty eager to see it. Everyone told me how intense it was, I actually put it off for a little while because I wasn't sure I was in the mood for something really bleak and existential.

Watching it I was like oh okay this is a movie. Not bad but I wouldn't call it an intense experience.

[โ€“] salarua@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Aquaman. the visual effects were ridiculous, the characters were one-dimensional, the soundtrack was...something, and the overall tone was that of a testosterone firehose to the face. i said the eight deadly words about halfway through, and i was thoroughly bored out of my mind despite action scene after action scene after action scene...the only reason why i didn't just get up and leave was because i was watching with a group

[โ€“] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

My god, even among DC movies, that was such a steaming pile of shit. And so what did they do? They made a sequel.

(Hey, I like DC movies. I really enjoyed The Flash, and I liked the Superman v. Batman, with Batfleck. So for me to say Aquaman was a turd in a punchbowl means something.)

[โ€“] Brutticus@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Sometimes I wish Hollywood still made lower budget movies, because this felt like it needed a lesser production value. Jason Momoa knew what kind of movie it was.

[โ€“] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For me, it was A Quiet Place. I found it incredibly dumb and impossible to believe that nobody on the whole of the planet ever considered that these aliens with ultra incredible hearing weren't somehow vulnerable to noise? Just dumb as fuck, especially when you consider that sonic weapons already exist and are used, and sound is routinely used in torture/incarceration scenarios.

[โ€“] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Eh, I think of it more in the vein of It Follows. It's not supposed to make sense, it's supposed to be a minigame for the audience to play along with the characters. It lays out a simple set of mechanics and then uses that to build tense dilemmas, giving the audience a chance to think about what they would do in that situation, and what they definitely want to prevent from happening.

I didn't see the second one, though. Heard it wasn't great (no pun intended).

[โ€“] Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Purge. They're all dumb as fuck. "No lawz fur wun day. Halps soseyetti."

Yeah no, trust in the government would break the floor and anarchy would reign instead. Not to mention businesses would probably refuse to operate here.

[โ€“] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't get me stated on how fucking dumb it is that everyone everywhere just immediately turns to murder. Crime isn't something I have a problem with, so when I say I've never committed a murder it's not because the pesky laws are stopping me. I just genuinely don't see the need to kill someone. But no, everyone and their mom is going full zodiac all day all night if it went for laws!

[โ€“] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That's a plot point in the prequel one (I've only seen the first one, though) and from one of the trailers I remember seeing, during the very first Purge people were just throwing huge parties and getting all kinds of fucked up, and the people on charge were disappointed because they just wanted people to kill each other.

It was posed as some sort of secret government conspiracy to keep the population/minorities/what have you "in check."

[โ€“] onlooker@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

James Cameron's Titanic. It's marketed as a romantic film, but the moment you start looking at other aspects of the movie, it just seems stupid. The antagonist is so cartoonishly evil, it's a wonder they didn't give him a mustache to twirl.

And then there's the ending. Oh dear lord, the ending. Spoiler warning and all that: at the end of the movie, The Titanic s(t)inks and the passengers try to get to safety. Rose finds a floating door or something to stay afloat and finds Jack swimming in the freezing ocean. Then Jack makes the most non-sensical decision in the entire movie: he sacrifices his own life for no good reason. The plot frames it as a necessary sacrifice, but it totally IS unnecessary, because there was enough room on the stupid door for two people. And then we flash forward to the present, where Rose is old, but still has that gem she wore throughout the movie... and then she tosses it into the ocean. WHY.

Basically the plot boils down to: two young people have a fling on a boat and then the boat sinks. It absolutely did NOT deserve all those academy awards it got that year.

[โ€“] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People are STILL bringing up the "there's enough room" arguments?

The movie LITERALLY shows you why it doesn't work. At first they both try to climb on it, but they're too heavy and the stupid thing capsizes. Only then is Jack like "You go take it, Imma good"

Also, Mythbusters tried it and got the same results. 2 people to heavy, 1 ok.

[โ€“] grrk@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, the Mythbusters actually proved the door could support two people. At the end James Cameron himself basically throws his hands up, concedes and makes some comment about "whatever, if the script says Jack has to die, Jack is dying." Rewatch the edpisode if ya don't believe me

[โ€“] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, after the took off their lifebelts and tied them under the door for adden buoyancy.

I think two people, already stressed to their teeth, now also suffering from hypothermia can be forgiven for not having the same presence of mind in that situation

[โ€“] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm reliably informed there are people who like Michael Bay's Transformers movies. The most interesting part of the entire series to me was watching a Camaro get into a literal fist fight with a Mustang. Otherwise my memories of the movie were having eye rollingly childish catch phrases boomed down at me, or visuals that are basically just technicolor television snow.

[โ€“] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Transformers for me was pretty much Megan Fox and nothing else.

[โ€“] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

There were other people in that movie?

[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The hilarious thing is that, in the script, Megan Fox's character is actually really interesting and multidimensional. And Bay films her as just some T&A.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Bronzefish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

No like is the wrong word. I love them. Don't know why thou, they are fucking stupid.
I mean its clearly an ad for the military where cars beat up cars. Buuuut Its hilariously epic and very comforting in its shallowness. Normally I am more of a weird indie movie guy. But every time optimus calls out all autobots in the end I cry.

[โ€“] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

I worked on the space shuttle program, and I found Armageddon almost unwatchable. I mean, those things go up with the big solid rockets and an external tank full of hydrogen and oxygen, all of which get jettisoned during launch, then they come down as a glider. But in the movie they're landing on asteroids and taking off again, smashing into things and still flying, etc. (remember how Columbia blew up because of a crack in the leading edge of one wing?). Plus the whole premise of it being easier to teach oil drillers how to be astronauts than to teach astronauts how to be oil drillers is a joke. Every astronaut I've met has been an amazing capable person - many are test pilots with multiple advanced degrees.

[โ€“] norimee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As soon as you know too much about a certain topic, any movie or series about it turns to shit.

I'm a nurse and badly done medical stuff in movies are so rampant and it drives me crazy.

[โ€“] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That's super true. What's worse is that it often turns out to be true of news as well. There have been a few times when I was familiar with events that made the news, and there were always inaccuracies in the articles. It's made me look at articles on events that I'm not familiar with differently; they probably have the same amount of inaccuracies.

I'm software engineering in aerospace, so a lot of computer and space stuff is ruined, which covers a lot of content.

But everyone should smack their heads about Armageddon.

[โ€“] Toribor@corndog.social 1 points 4 months ago

Astronauts brains are too big, their soft womanly hands incapable of drilling. Wearing a spacesuit and floating around a bit is trivial. Only some yeehaw boys and one man who 'tells it like it is' can save us.

[โ€“] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I always love the interview with Ben Affleck about Armageddon: "I asked Micheal why it would be easier to train drillers to be astronauts rather than vice versa, and he just responded with 'fuck you.'"

[โ€“] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Ha! I hadn't heard that - I'm glad someone involved called him out on it. I mean, I get that the real answer - to that and all my complaints - is that the movie doesn't work otherwise, but it's so annoying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)
[โ€“] Plum@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I was old enough to see the original trilogy re-released with all the bad dumb filler George Lucas thought was necessary to complete his vision.

All the poopy squelchy gross-out CGI was obviously a crass moneygrab, but it seemed like such a reflection of the man himself that I boycotted the prequels when they came out. Then I found Red Letter Media. Fuck the prequels. Fuck that creepy bastard. Han shot only.

[โ€“] FookReddit69@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The prequels had the best light saber fights in the franchise though.

[โ€“] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I guess they look prettier. But they are boring AF. There is no tension or stakes between the characters because they're all boring or unlikable and it's so highly choreographed it looks like dance number from a musical.

Yeah, OT lightsaber fights lacked action. But at least they had weight and meaning behind them. That makes them much, much better in my opinion.

[โ€“] FookReddit69@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're lightsabers wtf would they need weight lmao

Look, George Lucas wanted Wu xia style movies with space samurais and the choreography did that PERFECTLY. Is supposed to look like a dance, have you seen HERO or crouching tiger hidden dragon?

The Disney sequels tried to do a more "realistic" style, I bet inspired by John Wick or the bourne movies but with "swords" but failed, the mistakes can be seen during the choreography. I can't remember a single mistake being noticeable during the prequel fights.

[โ€“] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so you clearly only care about the action scenes and don't care about the story at all. Guess that's a view point that exists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Xer0@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, now that I've watched them more recently I enjoyed them a ton. At least Lucas had an idea of where he wanted to go with it, unlike the shit Disney trilogy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Matrix. So, so dumb. Dumb, lots of dumb.

Absolutely the most overhyped film I've ever paid money to see.

[โ€“] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Using people as batteries never made sense since you'd have to continually use energy to feed them and they really dont make that much heat energy.

[โ€“] Iapar@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

If I remember correctly in the first drafts they used the brain for computational power but went for the battery idea because it was, for a then tech illiterate audience, easier to understand.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ