this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
247 points (84.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26588 readers
3676 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheSaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apparently “rich” is different from “the rich”

That's Richard, he just likes to keep things casual.

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A person can be rich in many ways. A coral reef is rich in biodiversity etc.

The rich refers to the group of people who are financially rich to an obscene extent.

[–] TheSaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yea i know, but it’s next to poor, so i take it in the financial context

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

Sure, but I’m rich because I have a net worth of about €10k, retirement savings included. I’m not the rich, because my €700 rent is sometimes tough, even as part of a DINK couple.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Their diet was poor that's how they ended up a skeleton

[–] And009@reddthat.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Actually, it's just the shamanic potential of a tribe member

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Vegan here: hurting and killing innocent, defenseless animals for food because of speciesism is wrong and harmful.

The rich are extremely harmful to everyone and have no feelings worth valuing, so eating the rich is reducing the exploitation of animals and very, very vegan.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you know how many microplastics are in a full grown human? No thank you.

Maybe we ought to throw them in a pit, chain them to a wheel, and let them grind their own meal. Like the serfs in the good ol' days they long for.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So long as there is a risk of them reaccumilating wealth, no thank you. Yeet them into the sun.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I say we send them to Mars. "Congratulations, you won capitalism. Now time to play on hard mode"

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Do you want a galactic war between Mars and Earth? Because that's how you get a war between Mars and Earth.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Counterpoint, while it might be ethical to eat free range billionaire, it’s the least tasty of human meat because of all the cocaine use and STDs.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Uh isn't a core point of veganism to not consume things with sentience?

Even an "evil" human has sentience and doesn't wish to be eaten. (Unless they do, and in that case, crank that hog)

[–] muix@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Not entirely true. Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals.

Which leaves certain gray areas regarding the consumption of sentient beings. For instance, eating roadkill does not cause suffering for animals. Similarly, when Inuit people hunt animals, although it may cause suffering, it is their only means of survival. There are also instances where the only available medication contains animal products. Additionally, killing a human or non-human animal in self-defense when you haven't intentionally put yourself in that situation would be vegan.

On the other hand, the consumption of non-sentient items does not have to be vegan. For example, milk, eggs, and honey cause suffering for the animals that produce them.

Regarding the consumption of a CEO, one could argue that killing them is a form of self-defense and that eating them doesn't increase their suffering. Along with the net positive effects on the world, it could be considered very vegan.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

As clarification, the hunting and consuming of conscious sentient beings is pretty clearly not vegan. Eating something increases its suffering.

If the human does not want to be eaten, doing so (aside from after their natural death) is a hunt

Edit to be most clear, I meant isn't a core tenant not eating things USING their sentience, when you have caloric alternatives. If it died naturally it's just a hunk of meat

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Ethical maybe, but definitely not vegan

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are 'don't walk on the grass' signs speciesist? I feel like it's unfair that the other animals are allowed and i'm not.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Don't walk on the grass" signs are usually stupid anyway because vast expanses of bare lawns with nothing but a single kind of mowed grass are almost exclusively dumber, uglier, and worse for the environment than native plants. (To actually answer your question, no, because speciesism is differential treatment without critical thought as to why they're treated differently, and non-human animals ~~can't read~~ are way cooler than humans tbh.)

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago

possibly the funniest image