this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
98 points (93.8% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2694 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Saleh 11 points 1 month ago

They did not "block" arms sales anymore. Also the government has repeatedly reiterated, that they never blocked arms sales, but instead in their secret meetings they made decisions on individual cases which remain secret. However now they have decided in their secret meetings that they will be sending new weapons. Which, where and how remains secret...

I watch the press conferences of the government every time. Usually there is three a week. It sounds even more stupid, when you hear the government speakers reply this way to the journalists questions.

For anyone interested, here you can find most of them of the past ten or so years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_GBV4mb2DQ&list=PLuQE_zb4awhV8JxSNeJzUnHskCx0eyjVj

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A majority of people will always say they don't want a humanitarian crisis of any nature to continue. I feel as if a better metric to poll for is how many people will factor in these kinds of things when deciding on who to vote for, and how likely they will not vote for a party that supports it.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

A majority of people will always say they don't want a humanitarian crisis of any nature to continue.

"I want the war to stop" and "I want less/no arms sales to Israel" are two different statements. They're logically equivalent, but Israel and their supporters spend millions of dollars every year to prevent people from making that and similar connections, so it's a meaningful result coming from one of the world's Zionist hotbeds.

I feel as if a better metric to poll for is how many people will factor in these kinds of things when deciding on who to vote for, and how likely they will not vote for a party that supports it.

No argument there.