CDs suck. 20 Tracks max?? Also they're scratching easily. I never liked them.
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
Memes
45130 readers
1281 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Not if you burn 128kbps mp3s! Slaps CD You can fit an entire discography in this bad boy.
OPUS or even AAC is OK at 128 kb/s already but player compatibility is low.
If you know you're going to be playing it on VLC, you can even fit a decently good-looking 90min H.265 movie on one. When H.266 becomes widely available, the movie can be in 1080p at about HDTV broadcast quality.
20 tracks isn't the max, I think they can do up to 99
But the runtime is at most 80 min (nominally 74) so that limits the practical amount.
It would have been nice if LP modes were available in Red Book CDs (no compression but lower bit depth and/or mono). The motor controller can already handle a wide range of speeds to maintain a constant linear velocity. And if that turned out to be technically difficult, automatic two-pass mono could work - include an extra bit in the ToC for L/R channel, and play one of them first and then the other with the second half of the tracks. The result would be a double-runtime mono disc with a seek break in between two tracks around the middle (varying in length between players) but that would be acceptable for audiobooks. Of course CD-ROMs with MP3s/AACs are available but player compatibility is still problematic.
Twenty tracks? You whippershnappers don't know how good you got it! When I was growing up, we only had eight!
I had a 128mb mp3 player ^^