this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
130 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2296 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It's becoming increasingly clear that this election isn't Harris vs. Trump, it's Harris vs. Vance; Trump is just Vance's front man / advertising platform.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

I was hoping Harris would start rumors that the RNC was going to get Vance to stand in for a presidential debate since trump is too old.

I suspect he's in it only as a ticket out of jail.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

His handlers cut it short because his diseased brain had him rambling about how unfair Harvey Weinstein was treated.

[–] runiq 11 points 1 month ago
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Where's the conspiracy theories about Trump being replaced with an AI now that he ain't showing? It only.took one phone call from Biden to do that. Rubepublicans need education more than they will ever realize.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump-supporting rapper Waka Flocka Flame was offered up as an alternative, those two people say.

...

I mean at least they're promoting a replacement who can speak more coherently.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Doesn't he look tired

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

What I've been hearing is that Vance and Peter Thiel are running things behind the scenes because Trump's brain is so cooked

[–] Misspelledusernme@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

His family should put him in a home

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Politico:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/10/18/2024-elections-live-coverage-updates-analysis/trump-skips-another-interview-00184327
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support