this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

45130 readers
1344 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prunerye@slrpnk.net 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Valve is a company whose profit model is based on DRM. They were never your friend. Thanks for proton, though.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But this far they haven't abused that like other organizations.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yesterday I bought something on Steam for the first time in many years. (I have a large Steam library, but in recent years I've been getting games from gog and itch instead.)

Since I hadn't bought from Steam in a long time I figured I should read the "Steam Subscriber agreement" that you have to click to accept when you buy something. Let me just say now, the agreement is a very very bad deal for customers.

It goes to great lengths to make it very clear that you don't own anything. You aren't buying anything, you have no essentially rights. You are simply paying for a license subscription to use software with various conditions. Valve is able to end your subscription with no refund if you break the agreement. And the best bit:

Furthermore, Valve may amend this Agreement (including any Subscription Terms or Rules of Use) unilaterally at any time in its sole discretion.

So by using Steam we're putting a lot of trust in Valve; because the 'agreement' basically says they can do whatever they want, any time they want, for any reason they want.

Steam is quite good. I particularly appreciate their Linux support. But they are clearly using their position of dominance to make people agree to unfavourable terms. At the moment, things are fine. But make no mistake - when you use Steam, Valve has all the power. They can screw people over whenever they choose to.

With all that in mind, buying DRM free is better if you want to still have access to the software when a company decides to change direction for whatever reason.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not saying that I disagree, but it has basically always been written like that...

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but that's not a reason that something is bad. As pointed out. Buying DRM free is the only possibility to really own the games you purchased.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hope he has some sort of contingency plan. Perhaps he can find a successor.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're reading this GabeN, make Valve a non-profit.

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

I hope that GabeO will be ready for release soon.