this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
266 points (95.9% liked)

Fediverse

28493 readers
340 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 134 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That graph is so misleading. Makes it look like almost all the users disappeared but the Y axis only covers a small range at the top.

[–] Steve@communick.news 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The full range is about 5.5%. So while it is misleading, a 5% drop in a graph that consistent isn't nothing. Something substantial absolutly changed

[–] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe whole Instance that went offline.

[–] Blaze 12 points 1 month ago

That's my guess to

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cool then it should be 5.5% of the visual space for it to not be misleading. But it’s represented much larger. And OP is (edit to sound less mean) not updating the post sooo…

I call shade

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly. Not the over a million that it looks like at a glance.

The user count isn't helpful anyway, active users is a much better measure.

[–] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 month ago
[–] Blaze 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I captured the graph with the number after the decrease at the bottom right to try to show the number of lost users, but I see where you come from

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

Lies, damned lies and statistics.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

no it's not?

you can see the axes and op even mentions that it's a 5% drop

the graph is clearly just fitted to the data

[–] Blaze 11 points 1 month ago

I edited the title after their comment, it wasn't that clear at the beginning

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

In my classes on analytics, we were taught to prefer using normalised axes starting at 0 to more accurately put changes into perspective.

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

the graph is clearly just fitted to the data

That's the problem. It's heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which one of you forgot to open the app so we all ceased to exist to save on simulation resources?

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Go on... lol

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least user a log scale. But start at 0

[–] Blaze 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Feel free to suggest this to the Fediverse Observer team

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, I didn't know.

The monthly graph is pretty interesting in the same way, -400k?

[–] Blaze 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lots of farmbots going down looking at the servers graph

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Interestingly the amount of active users status pretty solid at 200k indeed

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interestingly there seems to have been an uptick in comments.

[–] Blaze 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Indeed, the plot thickens.

Maybe the farm bot owner decided to make all comments by a single bot now.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

Curiouser and curiouser.

Probably some mundane explanation but still...

[–] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 month ago
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was the metric measured before the day the was over which would limit the timeframe of the final day and show fewer users?
I dont see this chart when I click the link

[–] Blaze 1 points 1 month ago

It should be there, it's the second graph