this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
709 points (91.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9818 readers
102 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It's not like the government is forcing you to buy a car!"

If you live in a city with parking minimums, yes they fucking are.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 135 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of the funniest things about American car culture is that Americans probably walk the same distance from their parking spot to the store as I walk from my home.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And they're walking in car infrastructure. Some of the most unpleasant, not made for humans places, not to mention dangerous. Compared to walking in what a city should feel like.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 122 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually you're right. Didn't see that at first.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It still conveys the point pretty effectively regardless

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I didn't notice right away, but even after I did, I still think it gets the point across pretty clearly.

I'd probably want it to be human-drawn if it was going to be, for instance, posted up physically outside somewhere, but for something some random person on the internet can do to get a point across, I'd say it's pretty valid for what it is.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how accurate it is though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] amelia 65 points 1 month ago (24 children)

As a European, this is the first time I ever heard about parking minimums. What a horrible concept.

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago (5 children)

From Germany: huh? Quite common around here and I am sure in other european countries as well, despite having different city building concepts than the US. Lately it is slowly being replaced by bike infrastructure demands (and there was always the public transport demands), but it still exists.

[–] amelia 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm from Germany too. Is it really?! I had never heard of that. It can't be a thing inside cities though, can it? I honestly can't even think of a place where it would make any sense. Surely shops that are located outside dense urban areas would try to make sure they have enough parking space anyway.

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is naturally very complicated in Germany, it is Germany after all. Some Bundesländer have globale Vorgaben, others leave it to the Kommunen. But it is normally part of a Bebauungsplan, also in cities. It is oftentimes a flexible concept though. Here a little start into the toppic.

[–] Flipper 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes it's true. Where I live there is even parking space allocated for storage space. For each 100m² one parking space. Which is truly a ridiculous requirement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's not just oppression against "other forms of transport;" it's literally classist and (to the extent that race corresponds to class, which is a lot and on purpose) racist. A lot of these zoning laws about minimum parking requirements and minimum lot sizes date back to a time when United States government policy was explicitly designed to perpetuate segregation, and forcing every new parcel and development to be large and expensive enough to be unaffordable to most black people (because they were, and still are, poorer on average because of other institutional racism) was a part of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raptore39@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I was reading about a study that showed how much the climate temperature would rise if every house had solar panels on their roof. I then immediately thought, hey now, what if we had less asphalt everywhere, would that not affect overall temperatures as well?

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What was the conclusion? Asphalt shingles and slate shingles are already dark, so I'd imagine it would impact covered lighter roofing more.

[–] raptore39@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You have a good point there. The study was done using simulation models, so I should look into what they took into account and maybe who funded the study. You can read it here

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just to be really clear, too, they're looking at local effects (they say "urban microclimate"), not overall climate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] hobovision@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The horrible AI slop looks so bad if you look at it for longer than a second. Do better yall.

[–] Wrufieotnak 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Thing is: you don't need to look at it longer than a second to understand what is meant to be conveyed. So no, goal achieved, good use of resources instead of overspending on one useless metric (=making it realistic)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›