this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Spaceflight

610 readers
47 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Good luck to them! Ariane and Vega need some serious competition, and I'd love to see Europe have their own crew and cargo vehicles.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

One derivative vehicle, the Miura Next Heavy, would use two additional first stages as side boosters, analogous to the Falcon Heavy. In expendable mode it could place up to 36,000 kilograms into an ISS reference orbit, decreasing to 19,500 kilograms if the side boosters are landed back at the launch site.

A second derivative, Miura Next Super Heavy, would use four first stages as side boosters, arranged in a cross formation, an approach Torres likened to Russia’s Angara A5 launch vehicle. That would place 53,000 kilograms into an ISS reference orbit, or 13,660 kilograms into a Mars injection trajectory, in fully expendable mode.

They really went full Kerbal on that last one.

Photos source

A quadruple booster landing would certainly be something to see, though I imagine it would be most efficient to stage them in pairs, landing two at a time.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Even if staging in pairs is more efficient, I want a Korolev cross.