uh no, i think the point would be that it's a scary game. This isn't a fucking beavis bacon teaches you typing simulator game.
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
309 points (95.8% liked)
PC Gaming
8361 readers
1184 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Beavis teaches typing would probably be a riot
that would most certainly make for an interesting experience.
nice instance btw
It sound like most didn't read the article. You aren't playing as the shooter, it is a horror game where you are the victim trying to escape and/or hide from the shooter.
I haven't read the article, probably won't, doesn't really interest me. But I thought the title pretty clearly implies you don't play as the shooter. I'm surprised others didn't interpret the same way.
Oof... Man, to live in the US. I don't envy you guys, though things aren't really going the right direction here in the Netherlands, either.
No parent should go through what they have gone through. And they want to express that through a game. It is an incredible idea, especially because of interactivity of the medium. I always believe that art can help hold a mirror to the society and this game proves that.
From the trailer and article this looks and sounds well done. It reminds me of Amnesia, at least in that type of psychological horror.
Reminds me of the opening scene of one of the CoD games where you just walk into an airport and start opening fire on random people. I did not continue playing that game.
IIRC you never actually have to shoot any of the civilians in that level, but as players we all assumed that you did. IMO that level was the most interesting commentary that has been made in the COD series because it (somewhat sneakily) put the onus onto the player. Most of us just assumed that we needed to gun down the civilians without choice. In my opinion its one of the more poignant moments in the entire series for how it handled such a grim story beat.
By any chance, have you ever played Spec Ops: The Line? I feel you'd enjoy it.
Iirc in Germany the game was censored in a way that you lose the game if you actually shot someone.
It wasn't some sort of ethical quandary. The point of the game is to shoot people.
I disagree. Point one, the point of COD games was always to be the "Good Guys™" defeating the "Bad Guys®" but this level has you doing Bad© Guy™ stuff... So do YOU do bad guy stuff because you've got to so you can do Good° Guy© stuff or do you abstain? This point is somewhat ruined by "The cops showed up, we gotta shoot them." Which then directly shows you the gameplay loop of the entire game and begs you not to engage with it.
Point two, Spec Ops: The Line, don't worry not the white phosphorus scene. In the refugee camp you need to disperse a crowd of unarmed refugees who are going to kill you. They've killed your squad mate and your other squad mate awaits your order. You open fire on the crowd and your squad mate says "What the FUCK? You didn't need to gun them down!" Jokes on you, the whole time you could've shot in the air and they would've run. You made the choice to gun them down despite not having weapons. The gameplay loop is "Shoot bad guys because they shoot at you" not "shoot anything you feel threatened by."
The point of the game can be anything. The gameplay loop is to shoot enemies to win levels. The point was that unarmed civilians aren't enemies. Are cops though?
I can't wait to see speed runners cheese it and completely miss its point :/
TBF, generally speedrunners start speedrunning games because they love it to death (ie. have played it through several times already) and want to start challenging themselves in new ways.
...or the videogame is known to make views on youtube.
Anyway, this don't undermine the intention of the developer.
Speedrunning isn't THAT popular. If you want to chase trends there are much easier ways other than spending thousands of hours on a single game to have low chances of make a record.
Yeah I agree. the effort to profit ratio on speed running is so low there is no way anyone is doing it for profit over their love for the game.
I tried speed running a game once and it was exhausting. It's like accusing math professors of publishing papers for the money.
Except for the people that try to cheat to do it.
A videogame making views on YouTube is only incentive for first playthroughs as views on YouTube are usually for people's reactions to stuff. Speedrunning really usually is a passion project.
load more comments
(2 replies)
No one has a record on speedrun.com time for me to get that world record!
I beleive in you!
? Why come up with a hypothetical outcome just to make yourself mad? Is there some trend of speedrunners ruining educational games I am missing?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Can't wait for this to release and then be sited as a reason why the next shooting happened by Republicans because "It's them dang video games desensitizing these kids to violence."
This game makes me SMILE because it SHOWS me that TRANS KIDS EXISTING are WORSE then LITERALLY BEING GUNNED DOWN!
-Pro Life Republicans trying to Protect The Children!
Uhm, Columbine RPG anyone?
view more: next ›