this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
282 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

5601 readers
706 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

See you next week!

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Great book on the topic:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393310728

Good example:

Let's say the statistic says for a given area, violent crime rose 27% over a 10 year period.

You leave out the inconvenient fact that the population rose 30% over the same period of time and the per capita RATE of violent crime is down.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That "#1 is Business Statistics" category says it all.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Lies, damned lies, something something

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The easiest thing in the world is to manipulate stats to get the result you want, the hard part is getting non biased results

[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are Republicans or Democrats better for the economy? You decide!

Hack Your Way To Scientific Glory

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 2 months ago

"Democrats have a slight lead across the nation!"

Me: oh so we're going to lose pretty horribly. Cool. :(

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So the trick i was taught when making regression models is to write your syntax systematically so as you include additional factors, you can check which coefficients change. That can give you a sense of what's going on, and you can ultimately refine it to demonstrate your findings in a series of models (which is ultimately a way of looking at mediators) although at some point you're just making structural equation modeling.

This doesn't stop at just additional variables, though, you can see if your model improves with exponents, play with splines, and more. I'm personally fond of checking moderators-- factors that interact. And I guess it you're feeling a bit bayesian you could look at the BIC or something.

Edit: oh right, btw polical polsters have literally no concept of good research, so all this is just woooosh.