this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
526 points (91.2% liked)

Political Memes

5405 readers
3237 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You'd think midterms would be a great time to get your name out there and run high profile candidates to win House districts led by charlatans...

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (10 children)

If third parties were more effective then the screaming about them "stealing votes" that are supposedly owed to the two main parties would just be louder.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Also getting sued into the ground.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The "get your name out there" idea is the problem.

For a third party to be successful they'd need to first build a massive grassroots movement behind it. That takes a lot of effort and may not be successful.

And what happens if you build that grassroots movement but the Democrats say "hey people seem to care a lot about this issue so lets put it on the platform." Then what if the Dems actually deal with that issue? Well then that grassroots movement was a success! Except the leaders of the movement may not "get their name out there" as their name isn't on a ballot that everyone sees.

Basically US third parties are mostly about giving name recognition to a few individuals (who may or may not have brain worms) so they can get on TV and have some notoriety. People voting third party feel like they're sticking it to someone... when really the people they're sticking it to don't have enough votes to do much and the people they're voting for just want to be on TV.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Pretty much the entire operating philosophy and goal of third parties is wrong.

Like you've said "Getting your name out there" has been a complete failure. I think it's safe to say at this point that it doesn't work. If Democrats or Republicans had used it as a strategy, they'd be rightfully dragged.

The "do well enough to get national funding" goal hasn't worked either. Ross Perot got 8% with the Reform party, but no ones even heard of that party.

This is why I consider third parties to just be grifts and scams. Either that, or they're truly stupid.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Much past very local elections, absolutely. City and maybe county elections don’t have this problem since nobody really cares. It’s an entirely different ball of wax.

The real problem is making the jump past that into “real” positions.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is this meme format supposed to imply that water is bad for you? Because that's what I get out of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever participated in local politics?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›