this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1370 points (99.2% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5757 readers
777 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[โ€“] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Fish are friends!

A shark would love this.

[โ€“] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

CopenHill deserves a mention, although it would be nice if it were more of a blueprint for industrial architecture going forward, rather than a wonder unique to one progressive European country.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gRr6_bORSMs

[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago
[โ€“] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

A true wonder!

Any time someone sees it they will wonder "why did someone build that thing?"

[โ€“] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I definitely like the fish way better than that stupid church.

[โ€“] Gork@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I wanna work in a fish shaped building lol

[โ€“] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I can't think of a single thing built in the last century that will still be there in a thousand years. We may still build some cool stuff, but none of it is durable anymore it seems.

[โ€“] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Survivorship bias. The ancient stuff that survived to the modern day are not more durable than contemporary engineering, they're just the 0.1% of structures that managed to survive this long.

The problem isn't that we can't build something that will last a millennium, it's that we rarely, if ever, need things to last that long. Nuclear waste storage facilities are the only thing that comes to mind. Everything else would need to be torn down and renovated or brought up to code at some point.

[โ€“] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

These Late English signs seem to say the tomb is... cursed? They were trying to contain something evil. All the scouts we send in fall ill and die within days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Hitler's flak towers are not going anywhere. There's other 20th century buildings which can last a thousand years with occasional maintenance, but those flak towers, nothing will take them down.

Most very old buildings that survived to this age, survived because the locals had a use for them and maintained them, or because they had a pyramidical shape. The colloseum was a castle, the parthenon a church, ... Without that usage, we'd only have the foundations and a few basements left.

[โ€“] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I don't know. There's a bunch of giant statues that have been built. Buddhas, Guan Yu, Ghengis Khan, etc.

I have no idea if these were cheaply made, which I suppose is likely, but if they're concrete/stone, I could see them possibly lasting.

[โ€“] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

The whole of Benidorm is a modern Wonder

When you get home you wonder why you went, why you didn't catch any diseases and why you went to so many drag bars

[โ€“] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Groups mostly stopped building nice buildings when marketing in other ways became cheaper.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ