this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
275 points (98.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40296 readers
158 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 58 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ente is a beautiful, private cloud for your memories, with apps for mobile, desktop and web.

At Ente, we use Local AI to deliver features like face recognition and magic search, while respecting the privacy of your photos.

We'll now join a cohort of builders pushing technology forward for an AI that is light, private and accessible.

[–] B0rax 46 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But with fewer breaking changes.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People really underestimate the value of stability and predictability.

There are some amazing FOSS projects out there ran by folks who don't give a crap about stability or the art of user experience. It holds them back, and unfortunately helps drive a fragmented ecosystem where we get 2,3,5 major projects all trying to do the same thing.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I wanted to like immich, but it felt like everytime I opened it there was a little box saying there was a new version available. Which would be fine except for when that new version wasn't compatible with the server version I was running, and upgrading that frequently needed changes to my compose file because they changed some option or library or something.

I just want something that can store pictures of my family without a lot of tinkering.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The issue here is that these are solvable problems, release compat isn't a new problem. It's just a problem that takes dedicated effort to solve for, just like any other feature.

This is something FOSS apps tend to lack simply due to the nature of how contributions tend to work for free software. Which is an unfortunate reality, but a reality none the less.

[–] myliltoehurts@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In their defense, they also clearly label immich as under active development with frequent changes and bugs.

Edit: nvm I saw it was already discussed in another reply.

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Immich is quite new clearly say they will have breaking changes.

https://immich.app/roadmap/

Stable release planned for this year

The updates are almost always packed with cool new features so I'd rather have an amazing app with a bit of maintenance then get something stable that lacks features. Especially when stability is now just around the corner.

As far as breaking changes go, in the year of me using the docker install I've had maybe 3 updates that required me to change things and each one was leas than 10 mins of work. Pretty basic stuff if you are actually on the selfhosted path. Most people complaining seem to like auto updating apps automatically which seems crazy. I update when I have time to mess around, otherwise it just chugs along super stable.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I didn't really mention immich directly here.

This is a problem which is endemic to casual software development like many FOSS projects. It's a reality of how free software tends to be built in general vs commercial software.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

No, like a duck.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This being self hostable makes me instantly like this. Something like G photos that I could self host and dump a lot of shit off my phone storage would be amazing.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

I use Immich. It does what you described as well.

[–] Alk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Check out immich, I use that self hosted and it's exactly like Google photos. It even has optional facial recognition.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 16 points 1 month ago

Technical question, if it's e2ee, it means videos can't be transcoded? Modern smartphones encode video at a bitrate that doesn't allow real time streaming on 4g

[–] tkw8@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago
[–] pipe01@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago

Been using it for a while, works well

[–] variants@possumpat.io 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ente supports all files that have a mime type of image/* or video/* regardless of their specific format.

so it handles raw images too?

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Since it's end to end encrypted, Ente just sees some raw bytes, it has no way to tell if what you uploaded is an image or not. So in practice it supports whatever the client can display, so your browser for the web version.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Considering you can assign any IME to any file, that means technically it supports everything from plain text to proprietary binary data.

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

So Ente, like duck?

Edit: just checked it out (yes it's duck), what's the appeal over a self hosted nextcloud?

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is a photo gallery that can replace Google photos, while using nextcloud as a photo gallery is a proof of concept that can't be even considered alpha quality

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This can also be self hosted and is a much better photo gallery than nextcloud.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be really nice if I could have it sync to both. I'd like to sync it locally and have all the features available, but for convenience I would also like the option of a secure, reputable cloud service that costs a reasonable fee.

They seem good. However, using the app seems to be either/or (local or their service)

They're also twice the price of Google, which is a bit tough to swallow.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Technically I think you can use any S3 compatible storage.

I was looking at running a garage instance on a Zimaboard at my parents' house, but didn't bother to follow through.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hang on there. Yes, NextCloud photos is kinda a dump, not gonna lie. Do not like.

But Nextcloud Memories is a labor of love, and it's been freaking AWESOME. A little bit of Docker knowhow and the NextCloud AiO image is a great combo.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I tried nextcloud photos for ten minutes and it looked like you can add photos to an album only at the moment of their creation. And you need to choose them one by one, don't have "select all". And you can't select photos already uploaded in the past. What? Couldn't think of a worse gallery than this.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah I honestly agree. Memories is a vast improvement, so much so that it should just be the default at this point. I went so far as to get a menu customizer addon to just remove Nextcloud Photos as an option. I feel like it puts off new users more then helps anything.

I'm glad there's other options like the OP link, but I seriously enjoy Memories / Nextcloud for hosting it on my own hardware. Very little maintenance, has an app. Uploads from my phone whenever I plug it in to charge. Basically more than enough feature parity with Google photos that I could finally dump that mess. :)

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Well ente means "mine"

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nobody ever talking about lychee ?

Yes okay it's not GPL or written in a fancy new language (PHP is still alive xD). But it's simple, elegant, no UX bloat, no ML or IA stuff... Just a plain simple self-hosted photo manager.

One thing I really liked about it, you can import you external photo's with .xmp files, just one checkbox away.

The tag feature is simple but working as expected. Nothing fancy but it does best what's it's supposed to do !!

Call me old boomer but I really like the simplicity of lychee. It's a bit like how reading an article from miniflux or wallabag... Simple html files without bloating your eyes or your brain...

Just my 2c, nothing to see here !

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The selfhosted photo management boom happened when Google announced paid plans for Google Photos. That's why there are lots of alternatives aiming at replicating every feature.

In my case, I don't want to manually tag anything. I want a FOSS Google Photos. Nothing more, nothing else. If Immich was orosuction ready I would have akready switched. I haven't read much about Ente, but I have no interest in the rest because they lack some key feature I really appreciate.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I'm not sure why every time I look at this project, it rubs me the wrong way. Anyone found anything wrong with it?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Any guesses why that is?

load more comments (5 replies)