this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

Games

16796 readers
571 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] immutable@lemm.ee 46 points 1 month ago

Board of Directors shocked, absolutely shocked, that they were supposed to be directing the company. When reached for comment several wealthy looking people were seen with dictionaries in hand looking up the word “director” looking absolutely aghast

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Start with the fact that you get about 30 UAC POPUS when launching anything Ubisoft related. That alone, makes me hate your company.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those damn POPUS! I hate them!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago

UAC POPUS sounds like a new Doom character.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ubisoft might have to get used to not owning high value stock, if they keep pushing through anti-consumer bullshit in their games.

[–] bingrazer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I never really bought a lot of Ubisoft games because of their poor practices and buggy games, but the thing that pushed me over the edge never to buy from them again was with Anno 1404.

They took Anno 1404, made a few tweaks (the largest of which was some higher resolution support iirc), and released it as a new game, Anno 1404 history edition. They then delisted the original game on steam and made the two incompatible for multiplayer.

So if I wanted to play a game I already own with a friend who didn’t own it before they delisted it, I would have to buy the game a second time. It would only be $15 to buy it, but it was a massive “fuck you” to everyone who owned the game

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

My BIL is absolutely convinced that Ubisofts woes are entirely because of Yasuke and not at all related to anticonsumer BS and tired reskinned copy pasted games.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the company leading the "fuck you, you can't own the game we charge you top dollar for" charge, right?

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Wasn't Rockstar riding that train first, though? How many games has Ubisoft produced since GTAV released, I wonder...