this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
174 points (97.8% liked)

News

23258 readers
2691 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump are pushing back against efforts by federal prosecutors to streamline arguments and potential appeals in his 2020 election interference case, arguing they could improperly influence the 2024 race for the White House.

In papers filed Monday in federal court in Washington, defense attorneys contended that special counsel Jack Smith's plans to file an oversized brief about whether certain Trump actions from his presidency were official or unofficial acts is improper and should not be allowed.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I can't stand the way the courts are being held up. So trump lawyers file a delay, then argue it's too close to the election/might influence it. They argue the president has immunity for official acts, but no it's improper to assess what acts are official. Mother fuckers- it should influence the election. America deserves to know if they're voting for a candidate guilty of enabling an insurrection.

[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

It’s absolutely infuriating how absurd our “system” has become. There are jokes, and then there’s the U.S. government and judicial branch. It’sa whole other level of bullshit.

The most fury-inducing thing? There’s not a fucking thing us normies can do about it. We just have to watch the collapse in real time.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whether it should or not is completely irrelevant. It's plenty arguable that any events influence elections, regardless of how close those events are to the election. That's how people make voting decisions, on things that happen.

Judge Chutkan has already strongly expressed that her court will not consider anything election related when proceeding through this case.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Judge Chutkan has already strongly expressed that her court will not consider anything election related when proceeding through this case.

That would be good news in any of his other cases, but might not be ideal for the one about election interference 😉

[–] havocpants@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

America deserves to know if they're voting for a candidate guilty of enabling an insurrection.

It was literally televised. We all saw him do it, and I'm in another country. How the fucker isn't in prison a hundred times over at this point is insane.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While yes, absolutely we all saw this, he deserves his trial just like any other criminal. More importantly the American public deserves the disgusting gritty details that will be revealed.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He doesn't deserve a trial if he keeps delaying it. It seems to me he doesn't want one.

[–] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

So... interfering in an interference case.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Jack Smith’s plans to file an oversized brief about whether certain Trump actions from his presidency were official or unofficial acts is improper and should not be allowed.

Then how the fuck do you determine it after the SCOTUS ruling?!

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

They got it fucked up. An election should not influence a trial.