this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

First RCS now this, today has been wild

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

ABOUT FUCKING TIME. Take edge and shove it so far up your data tracking sphincter of a face hole.

Can we please get these laws on a global level.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Nope. But hey look, the Democrats are coming to take your guns!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m not disagreeing, but what entity would enforce those global laws?

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

La Haye International Court of Justice, of course.

And what happens when the country in question is one that doesn’t care that much about the ICC, and responds “make me”?

To wit: The United States has famously refused to subordinate itself to the ICC

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Same way laws are enforced now? Each country passing it and the companies needing to comply to continue operations.

Why are they force to comply right now if the laws don’t work?

You’re missing the point.

The ICC only has power in countries that let them have power. If a given country doesn’t feel like doing that, the ICC has precisely zero recourse or ability to enforce.

What should citizens in countries like that (which may or may not be dictatorships, single-party states, theocracies, or some other restrictive, un-democratic, and/or xenophobic form of government) do?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Thank you Europe. Once again you prove yourself to be what we all aspire to be.

[–] CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

As an American, all I can say is thank you Europe for continuing to have sensible legislation that forces these companies to have decent policies worldwide if only to comply with EU laws. I only use Windows on my company provided laptop but just because I don't need to worry about it personally doesn't mean that I shouldn't care about how it affects others.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Why yes Microsoft, I am totally a European in Europe right now...

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So apparently having consumer-friendly laws does in fact lead to better products. Cool.

Perhaps the USA and other countries should follow the EU's good example on this.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

But socialism! They're all gonna be starving and homeless! Any day now...

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Once steam covers 90% of games windows becomes irrelevant.

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So what you’re saying is, 2024 will be the year of Linux on the desktop?

[–] Matombo@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

yes he did and if it doesn't happen we can shame him for all eternety, but i'm right with you there buddy: 2024 lets gooooooo!

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

For gamers-only maybe lmao

E: and people willing to spend several hours a month wondering why their OS broke again

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

If you don't tinker like the usual Linux user your os won't break more often than windows

[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At last. This is actually good news for Windows itself because people will be more inclined to use it again if they don't see ads, aren't tracked, can set any default browser etc.

So it's good for both users and Microsoft.

Sometimes these corporations just can't help themselves by adding trash and they need a mommy figure to force them to stop doing that which ultimately benefits themselves.

[–] sergih@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thing is for me windows opened a pandora's box that goes further than just ad-free, once I started getting into open software thanks to switching to linux, I realized it's not just the them saying there's no tracking, it's the being able to see it for yourself, it's the there being a 1000 eyes on a project that don't have a motivation to lie to you, checking making sure that there are no trackers.

It's no longer just sbout them saying "it's all good we ain't spying" it's about a project with a thousand eyes on them making sure this is actually the case, plus the nature of most open licenses where every fork also needs to follow such license.

It's starting to become a sort of change in how I see society working with each other and I whish there were other aspects of life where such a philosophy vould be applied.

[–] query@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They say if you don't pay, you're the product, but that's obviously bullshit, paying solves nothing. The saying should be never trust corporations.

[–] sergih@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

If you don't pay, you are the product. If you pay, you are the product + you are paying.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

god has nothing to do with it

[–] Herbstzeitlose@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

In this moment, you are euphoric.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Does this also mean Google will let me uninstall Chrome from my Android device? Or is this only about PC's?

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hope we will get there too. Be able to fully install and uninstall Google services.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hope the ability to install whatever OS on your phone that you want will become mandated and the default for all cell phones.

[–] daYMAN007@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Even if this was allowed. Surely most apps wont run anymore in the name of security