this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37643 readers
147 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

spacex should just schedule it to be launched into space; that ought to do it

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Srsly, no-one going with the "it's free real estate" meme.

Jokingly, but also really, seems a waste. I get they don't want the overhead, but just boost it north, perhaps to a Lagrange, maybe just high orbit, but someone will come along to salvage eventually...

ETA: Also, one of the beauties of SpaceX is that Musk doesn't muck with it (yet), working too well without him, unlike everything else he's bollocksed up.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

There is no Lagrange point "North".

L1 is sunwards, L2 is counter-sunwards, L3 is on the other side of the Sun, L4 is Eastwards, and L5 is Westwards.

Going from LEO to L1/L2, requires a ∆v of 7.5km/s, which is comparable to the 9.4km/s ∆v required to go from Earth surface to LEO.

Meanwhile, the ISS keeps getting slowed down by Earth's atmosphere, and it only takes a ∆v of 1km/s or less, to plunge it into denser atmosphere for reentry.

[–] SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It makes me really sad that the space station is going to be destroyed since I always really liked it, but the sheer amount of fuel needed to move it to a stable position makes me (begrudgingly) understand why they're going to do it...

[–] Deepus@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Anyone able to put the deltaV into tons of fuel needed for this manoeuvre? Extra points if you can do the full thing of getting the fuel to the station.

It really is a shame though, its such an iconic structure. Would be nice if we could class it an the 8th wonder of the world but dont know enough about classification to know if it even could be.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Endless handouts for leeches. Denial of basic human needs for everybody else.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is this a handout? They bid for a contract and won it vs competitors.

I'm hoping we get a source selection statement soon where they spell out why companies like Northrop and Blue didn't win.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

SpaceX's track record for orbital insertion definitely had something to do with that. When last I knew, N-G didn't have its own launch facilities (that might've changed in the last few years but I doubt it).

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I brought up Northrop because I'm guessing they bid a Cygnus derived deorbit vehicle.