this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
1477 points (98.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35548 readers
68 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's impressive how duckduckgo manages to be so much better than bing despite being a frontend for bing

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

At least what you are looking for, is on the first page. With Google you get half a page of ads not relevant to your search, and two pages of SEO garbage, before you get to a relevant search.

[–] sunbunman@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Isn't this the same as Google?

[–] eldoom@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only thing bing is good for is watching porn and I will stand by that opinion.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] eldoom@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Just do a video search for whatever your kink is and turn off safe search

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it's Microsoft. You don't need to edgelord censor yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you are interested maybe look at this post I made comparing search engines

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

I don't get malware and AI on firefox, but uBlock count's continually up. I know this behavior only from trash dump sites.

[–] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (8 children)

SearXNG is also amazing. The only reason I don't use it more is because it doesn't have an integration into the URL bar in Firefox.

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can't you add it manually?

load more comments (1 replies)

Dude. When you're looking at whatever search just right click in the url bar and there will be an option to add that search engine. Then in settings you can make it your default if you wish.

The reason I don't use SearXNG is because the public instances always seem to be slow and or broken.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 6 points 2 months ago

Google is even worse.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I've been using my own searxng instance for a few months now and my god I'm never going back.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 2 months ago (16 children)

If you know you want Logitech software, why not go directly to the Logitech site and search there?

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I typed the URL that was literally printed in the packaging of a [new] Logitech mouse, and the page didn't exist! Like, how?!‽

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Sometimes brand websites are done well and you find what you're looking for within a few clicks, but more often than that, the website will be a horrendous experience.

Google search results used to usually bring up the direct link to the download page on that brand's website. Pretty much as the first search result.

To be fair, that also was a time where brand websites were really bad.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›