serenissi

joined 2 months ago
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Oh I thought it has some hidden proxy feature to access porn in workspace.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The text. And probably images too (but the only mistake being the wrong port depiction (all c) says more human).

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Afaik steam deck doesn't have a gps module. You've to get any of their identifying information.

What you can do is perhaps sending memes with different cannery token redirects for each worker. Send them around when the device is being used. That way you can compare the grabbed ip with steam log and see which worker's match. As the deck doesn't have sim they either will use home wifi or mobile hotspot. Both will work this way.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

scaled by system/themselves ... looks like those are x11 apps. why is firefox into this? run it as native wayland with MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I've a suggestion that might work depending on how honest the perspn hiring the worker is and on their contract. You can tell the person to send some questionnaire or feedback form etc to all of them which will track their ip and name/email (say unique form per worker). Then you can match the ip, as home ips are mostly static for short duration. Tell them to send the form at night or sometime when they'll be at home and give it a short deadline.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe but there are tons of other factors too and honestly we don't know yet. But the astrologers neither.. So no, no connection with astrology which is just a guesswork.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the bad guys use bots or services and are done. regular users have to endure while no security is added

put in other words, common users can't easily become 'bad guy' ie cost of attack is higher hence lower number of script kiddies and automated attacks. You want to reduce number. These protections are nothing for bitnet owners or other high profile bad actors.

ps: recaptcha (or captcha in general) isn't a security feature. At most it can be a safety feature.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

stopping automated requests

yeah my bad. I meant too many automated requests. Both humans and bot generate spams and the issue is high influx of it. Legitimate users also use bots and by no means it's harmful. That way you do not encounter captcha everytime you visit any google page, nor a couple of scraping scripts gets a problem. Recaptcha (or hcaptcha, say) triggers when there is high volume of request coming from same ip. Instead of blocking everyone out to protect their servers, they might allow slower requests so legitimate users face mininimal hindrance.

Most google services nowadays require accounts with stronger (like cell phone) verification so automated spam isn't a big deal.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And what will you do if a person in a CGNAT is DoSing/scraping your site while you want others to access? IP based limiting isn't very useful, both ways.

view more: next ›