this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
127 points (96.4% liked)

Linux

48316 readers
808 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During the first impressions of said distro, what feature surprised you the most?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zicoxy3@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Fedora. I was always with Mint and Cinnamon. I tried Pop!Os, Manjaro and Debian, whenever I could with Cinnamon. Fedora was recommended to me, which I had never entered in the distros to try. I installed it and I've been using it for 2 years with its respective updates. No problems at all. I had not tried Gnome. I don't like it the most but I'm fine with it.

[–] wulf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Second impression of Garuda (Arch based). My first impression was the dragonized version, which is KDE with lots of mods to make it Mac like, but with extra window animations.

I like things simple, so when I tried Garuda again, I installed the Gnome version. Other than some weirdness getting my Nvidia card working with Wayland, it has run better than anything else on my laptop.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago

Arch Linux. All the software at their latest version (which is usually the best one), within a couple of commands, either from the huge official repos or the AUR.

[–] space_of_eights@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Tuxedo OS, as preinstalled on my Tuxedo machine. It is just a heavily tweaked Ubuntu flavor with Plasma as a default desktop and sane defaults (firefox not as a snap, but as a .deb file). Everything worked so well out of the box that I did not see the point in installing Arch. I also love the fact that Plasma is kept very much up to date. In comparison, Kubuntu 24.04 still has Plasma 5., whereas I currently run 6.1.4.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fedora Atomic/Kinoite, just so relieved when one day I fucked the bootloader, and it didn't boot anymore, and I only needed to rollback in grub to a perfectly working system

[–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You were able to get to the bootloader with a fucked up bootloader?

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Maybe i "fucked the bootloader config" should be better, and with fedora unified kernel support, you can rollback using the UEFI entry so even a fucked bootloader wouldn't stop you

[–] eleefece@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The old Pardus, YALI was, and still is, the most awesome installer i've ever meet. Also Kaptan was amazing

The old Pardus, YALI was, and still is, the most awesome installer i've ever meet. Also Kaptan was amazing

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago
[–] 4vr@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Pop OS has worked out well for me even better than Ubuntu & Fedora.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Kurumin Linux, which was a Brazilian distro based on Knoppix. This was back in 2006 or so, and that was my first hands-on experience with Linux.

I don't fully remember whether everything worked out of the box, I think it connected to the internet no problem (cable), but what amazed me was:

1 - It ran off the CD drive without needing to install anything 2 - It had loads of preinstalled utility software 3 - Less than 700MB

[–] THEWIZARD@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fossapup 9.5 how fast yet compitent it is at what it can use. Loading into ram with just 300mb or so HDD space being used, it's blazing fast the newer the machine it runs on. It's downside is it's smaller community driven development being in need of consistant conversion of regular apps to it's own puppy .sfs format which is needed to install them, if they had people churning new .sfs apps out all day every day of the year then eventually it would over-shadow many mainstream OS's it's just nitro level speeds and very stable to boot. It needs more love from the dev community to go that extra mile.

[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Chimera Linux. You'd think that a distro using its own bsd-like userspace and dinit instead of systemd is janky and unusable, but it's been one of the most painless experiences I've had.

Genuinely recommend trying it if you don't have an Nvidia GPU.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

Sabayon. It worked perfectly till I tried to update some stuff 💣

This was one the most stable and at the same time the most unstable distribution I ever tried.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›