this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
157 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4797 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Already exists, idiots. Adding five more ways to do the same thing is fucking pointless unless you're trying to disenfranchise voters. If you ever want this to work, make passports free, and available solely by mail. Oh, that's not possible? Neither is it for many people to go and get one.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 23 points 2 months ago

I have plenty of means and opportunity, and it's still difficult to renew a passport. At least, if you've moved.

They should be issued at birth and easily renewed.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure that's been present day for latin people in Arizona for over a decade already..

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Republicans embracing the school of redundancy school.

[–] LastWish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And we already have the Department of Redundancy Department.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago

I’m someone who would be without a paycheck if a shutdown happens, but PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let it happen this time right before the election.

One more thing for the GOP to take responsibility for just in time for early voting!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The maps in this article make the situation look sinister as fuck (because it is): https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/challenge-obtaining-voter-identification

In short, if you live outside a major city you could have a hard time aligning your schedule perfectly with the nearest ID-issuing office, and that's if you can afford the transportation and required documents to prove your identity.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If it was about verifying that votes were legitimate they shouldn't have a problem appropriating finding so that we go out to every single citizens house and ensure they are issued an ID that is to their standards (which they claim is citizenship). We know it's actually about ensuring that people who have a difficult time getting an id have a difficult time voting.

Edit. Whoops I spelled some thing wrong

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It’s an election year. Let them shut it down and lose the legislature

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

Voice of America - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Voice of America:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.voanews.com/a/republican-bill-to-avoid-government-shutdown-requires-proof-of-citizenship-to-vote/7775037.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support