this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

3952 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

About 13 years ago I had a debate with a friend about some political thing. He repeated something from the media (AM radio) I knew was BS so I told him I'd email him evidence to the contrary, he told me he'd send evidence in support. I sent him a mountain of evidence but never heard from him. The next time we met I brought it up he told me he didn't have time to read my email, his body language said otherwise. That's when I realized it was a cult

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Something I find funny - uncanny even - is how easily the roles swap. If someone sent you a mountain of 'evidence' for a flat earth or magnetising vaccines, and you threw it out saying obviously it's BS and you can't be bothered to read it, the internet would agree and laud you for common sense.

But OP-of-the-tweet sends her friend two 'sources' and we all agree the friend is an idiot for not believing the 'facts'.

I suppose what it means is, quantity of evidence isn't useless, but is only part of the search for knowledge.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have a cousin who is 100% convinced that the US government or someone is hiding anti-gravity from everyone. Something about wheel manufacturers having a chokehold on the world.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Have to be careful to not upset Big Wheel

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Reminds me of a guy I worked with. He even started the occasional sentence with "contrary to fact" before telling me you can order super powerful quantum computers on Ali express that can run your entire steam library concurrently.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

if showing people facts doesn't change their mind then how do you do it

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 7 months ago

Belief is social. If you can appeal to a group they have membership in, they're more likely to switch. If it sounds like you're a member of an out group, you're going to struggle.

So like if you're trying to get a evangelical to stop littering, framing it as like Jesus told us to shepherd the earth will probably work better than saying anything about scientists.

Also if you're trying to get someone to, like, stop believing in qanon, you're probably going to need to get them to leave that group. If they keep hanging out on those forums and groups, the brain is going to treat you coming with facts similar to how it would treat a threat to its physical safety. The brain really strongly prioritizes group membership. Probably because in prehistory, getting kicked from the group was extremely dangerous. If you can get them to no longer see the other cultists as their primary group, the transition is easier.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

If the past 10 years have told me anything, by being a large hard-right media conglomerate consistently pounding the same facts as the reason for everyone's fear, unifying desperate people against a windmill you propped up yourself.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

One of the biggest general things is giving them a graceful out.

One of the biggest markers of an intelligent person is the ability to accept they were wrong about something and update their world view. This leads them to finding the best understanding they currently can, rather than the first that stuck.

For most people this is extremely hard. If you also put them in a position where they feel like an idiot if they agree with you, many will just dig their heels in. Once this happens, the more you push the more they dig in. It has become part of their identity, and you are attacking it.

Unfortunately, the details about how to guide someone through are different depending on the person. Generally you want to align your new knowledge with their mindset, give them a good reason why they held their previous view, and how updating it improves them.

It's analogous to clearing sand with a hose Vs a sledge hammer. The sledge hammer will often compact the sand, rather than move it. Water can wash it away, but the process is slower. It also gets harder if it's previously been pounded with the hammer.

And rereading my word salad, I've got no idea how helpful it actually is as advice, but I'll post it anyway, in case it's actually useful to someone.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

stories about lived experiences are more effective, but ultimately it depends on the person being willing to introspect and change their mind

here's a full article about how to change people's mind, if you want to read more on the subject: https://time.com/6224300/how-to-change-someones-mind/

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But if he did change his mind after reading your sources he would have disproved the sources.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

Statistically and scientifically speaking, no