this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
566 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12180 readers
846 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 143 points 2 months ago (14 children)

If they actually removed it, and didn't have anything in the rules about topicality or humor, they suck and should be ridiculed

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

He got to keep his ribbons, he wasn't disqualified or anything and his other miniatures stayed up.

Some things can be expected not to work as a display in public.

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Only people who know would know. I don't see the problem.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago

I think the problem is they don't want this to become a 'thing' with people trying to push the envelope further and further.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago (35 children)

Eh, we have nude statues in public places, paintings too. Like, not in museums, in the open.

This model isn't even nsfw at all, it just references the subject of pornography, with one specific "genre" that's exemplified by a brand.

But, hey, they didn't penalize the maker, so it's all good to me :)

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

They at least let him keep his prize, though.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Ugh that just seems like fighting tightwaddery with more tightwaddery

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 70 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The cheek prints on the cushion are an excellent touch.

The state fair are a bunch of turds. Art is meant to provoke.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 28 points 2 months ago

The cheek prints makes me think the judges knew exactly what was happening here since they looked at it closely enough to give it an award. More likely is that some karen made a stink and they removed it to avoid the hassle.

[–] LemmyTryThisOut@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A piece he described as a “creepy sex dungeon” was removed before judging last year.

Yeah, so this isn't this guy's first time pushing the envelope with the miniatures art.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He should do That Pool next year.

[–] burrito@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

AIDS, everybody out!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's official: Kentucky hates fun.

Edit: also, for those who don't want to give the New York Post any clicks- https://www.lpm.org/news/2024-08-21/kentucky-state-fair-removes-winning-miniature-depicting-pornography-set

[–] Hyphlosion@donphan.social 4 points 2 months ago

But the miniature in the photo has a sign that says “Please do not touch.” So if all the miniatures had a sign like that, I don’t see what the problem would have been…

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

That's objectively hilarious.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 33 points 2 months ago

Poling added that “the guys” who may have been dragged to look at the miniature displays “got to enjoy a build that was meant specifically for them, in an area they might not otherwise be entertained.”

I mean.. he isn’t wrong..

[–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 28 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The sweat stain on the couch got me

[–] elxeno@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

15 years ago I did a school paper on the pros of psychoactive drugs, including a presentation in front of my class.

Nowadays I'd have to make a public YouTube video to stop the hate I'd receive. Or at least get kicked out of class.

Nobody really cared about stuff that wasn't affecting them.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Shoutout to the official who had to explain how they recognized this milquetoast office environment as "inappropriate"

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did they somehow not see the camera blatantly on the desk, feeding an image to the monitor, directly of the couch? Did they not see the butt imprint on the couch? Even if they didn't recognize the set it was based on, it was pretty blatant.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Well, it might have been judged by elderly Kentuckians who haven't seen porn since it was shot on film, if ever. So I don't find it surprising they went "Wow, super detailed couch! Give this guy a prize!"

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There’s a little clapperboard on it that says “The Casting Couch”

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Article says it wasn't there at judging.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Well I only opened the article to see the aforementioned buttcheek indents

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I would have assumed the Stanley parable.

Then Stanley spread his cheeks and waited...

[–] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah… that’s fair actually, it really is pretty hard to ‘fake casting couch’ your relatives

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›