this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
81 points (98.8% liked)

science

14307 readers
74 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Neolithic farmers and herders who built a massive stone chamber in southern Spain nearly 6,000 years ago possessed a good rudimentary grasp of physics, geometry, geology and architectural principles, finds a detailed study of the site.

Using data from a high-resolution laser scan, as well as unpublished photos and diagrams from earlier excavations, archaeologists pieced together a probable construction process for the monument known as the Dolmen of Menga. Their findings, published on 23 August in Science Advances, reveal new insights into the structure and its Neolithic builders’ technical abilities.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“These people had no blueprints to work with, nor, as far as we know, any previous experience at building something like this,” says study co-author Leonardo García Sanjuán, an archaeologist at the University of Seville in Spain. “And yet, they understood how to fit together huge blocks of stone” with “a precision that would keep the monument intact for nearly 6,000 years”.

They absolutely would have had prior experience if fhe process is complex. Humans tend to have bursts of developing new techniques sprinkled around, but a complex structure would be rhe result of combining existing knowledge in a new way with a few new techniques. They wouldn't figure a bunch of things out at the same time and build something to last thousands of years. They probably built similar structures that didn't hold up as well first and learned from it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup. We don't have evidence of them building predecessor sites because they didn't hold up.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

Or they tore them down and built newer version with better techniques!

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

Nope. It was aliens.

[–] kindenough@kbin.earth 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting read, thanks for posting.

[–] PepikHipik@lemy.lol 1 points 2 weeks ago

You're welcome.