this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
12 points (87.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43336 readers
766 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems like I'm always hearing about family vloggers getting put away for child abuse. I'm not into family vlogging, so maybe I'm wrong, but people always make it sound like these two channels were popular.

But then they go on to describe their videos, and it's always parents doing insane shit to make the kids cry on purpose, or announcing on camera that they're withholding necessities from the kids or something. I've never heard anyone say they like these videos, and I can't imagine why they would, so then how were they supposedly popular?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

Outrage bait?

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 9 points 2 weeks ago

What breaks my heart is knowing that people took parental advice from these channels.

I used to manage a team of low income women who were primarily first generation Americans. Many of them had tough moms who never hesitated to use β€œla chancla” on their many children.

Their sense of humor ended up pretty warped, and it was always my impression that it was a self defense thing to normalize the abuse they grew up with. By seeing that behavior as funny, it excuses similar things that were done to them.

I usually tried to ignore it without judging, but I always put a stop to it once they started sharing online videos at work. People are entitled to their own interpretation of their history, but there is no context where a video of a kid sobbing is funny to me.

[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Never heard of ether of them.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 8 points 2 weeks ago

Be glad. I sadly have heard of them and know what abuse the kids went through (especially 8Passengers/Ruby Franke, but DaddyOFive is very bad too)

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder if the video essayists exaggerate how popular the channels were before becoming controversial, because you're not missing much.

DaddyOFive pretty much constantly screamed at his kids and made them cry for views, and while the worst of 8 Passengers happened off-camera, in the videos they still openly talked about shit like taking their teenage son's bed away.

Even setting aside the justified outrage, I can't imagine who enjoys it. It's just unpleasant and sad.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't actually know, but in my mind the audience most likely to watch those cruel "pranks" and find them funny are kids or teenagers themselves.