this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
67 points (97.2% liked)

Transfem

3417 readers
113 users here now

A community for transfeminine people and experiences.

This is a supportive community for all transfeminine or questioning people. Anyone is welcome to participate in this community but disrupting the safety of this space for trans feminine people is unacceptable and will result in moderator action.

Debate surrounding transgender rights or acceptance will result in an immediate ban.

Posters may express that they are looking for responses and support from groups with certain experiences (eg. trans people, trans people with supportive parents, trans parents.). Please respect those requests and be mindful that your experience may differ from others here.

To make such a request, at the start of the body of your post, not in the title, the first line should look like the this: [Requesting Engagement from _________]

Some helpful links:

Support Hotlines:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
67
Transgender issues largely absent from the DNC (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/mtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shy_mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm not happy about it, but it makes sense.
They're trying to avoid polarizing issues so as to not alienate undecided voters. Either way a democratic presidency would be better for LGBTQ people than a MAGA presidency, so I'm not too upset about our issues being put on hold for a few days to achieve that. I imagine they'll become a little more vocal about them once they're actually in the White House, and if not we'll still be better off regardless.

Transgender people are a minority amongst minorities, catering to them while potentially alienating so many more voters is not a wise strategy. Reasonable trans voters will already vote for Harris because they know what's at stake.

I don't like it, but if it means keeping fascists out of the office, I can live with it.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agree. I'm still side eyeing them though. It's like the parents saying "go back in the closet so you don't upset our guests."

[–] shy_mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, though in this case it's more like "go back in the closet so we don't get deported." I don't like it, but I'll forgive it if it's necessary. Maybe it isn't, but with so little wiggle room it's better not to take chances...

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yes, still vote for Harris Walz but gurrrl...

[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, let’s leave it up to the states and do nothing for people in the south. If you wanna be queer MOVE TO CALIFORNIA and if you can’t afford rent we will sends pigs to kill you. Fuck electrical poltics, embrace community

[–] shy_mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Those are not mutually exclusive. I'm so tired of this nihilistic view.
Community and activism can only go so far, and since human decency is not something you can rely on, if you want things to get better you need actual laws that will protect you. The only way to have those is to actually elect people who at least have a chance to do something about it. That holds true both at the state level and federal level.

So yeah, strengthen your community, but for crying out loud vote for the right people as well.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 months ago

The 94-page Democratic Party platform that was voted on and passed on the first day of the DNC can be read here: https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/FINAL-MASTER-PLATFORM.pdf

Jump to page 56 for references to LGBTQIA+ issues, including specific callouts about the challenges of transgender people, as well as committing to pass the Equality Act (which sought to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in a variety of contexts).

I've learned to not rely on politicians to push for my civil liberties. Politics will not bring about our societal acceptance; it's the other way around. It's up to us and our allies to change the minds of the public at large, and then, as like magic, the will for politicians to grant us legal protections will appear.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 months ago

because they're already committed to the equality act and fighting anti trans laws in office; there's no need to get in a tug of war with culture war issues when it's more important to split up the republican party and erode support for trump in battlegrounds.

plus places like the nyt and the rest of the transphobic outlets would just push more anti trans pieces instead of talking about the actual issues.

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 months ago

Really doesn't matter. It's a written part of the party platform. The Justice Department has spent the better part of four years pushing back on regressive state policies. Every federal department has improved their policies for LGBTQ folk. None of us benefit from the mere mention at the convention.