this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
299 points (98.1% liked)

World News

38914 readers
2323 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers have issued a ban on women’s voices and bare faces in public under new laws approved by the supreme leader in efforts to combat vice and promote virtue.

The laws were issued Wednesday after they were approved by supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, a government spokesman said. The Taliban had set up a ministry for the “propagation of virtue and the prevention of vice” after seizing power in 2021.

...

Article 13 relates to women. It says it is mandatory for a woman to veil her body at all times in public and that a face covering is essential to avoid temptation and tempting others. Clothing should not be thin, tight or short.

Women are obliged to cover themselves in front of non-Muslim males and females to avoid being corrupted. A woman’s voice is deemed intimate and so should not be heard singing, reciting, or reading aloud in public. It is forbidden for women to look at men they are not related to by blood or marriage and vice versa.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 114 points 2 months ago
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If a woman existing in public is too 'tempting' for you, then either stay indoors or rip your ears and eyes out.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A religious coworker complained about women jogging, I reminded him what Jesus said to do when your eyes cause you to sin.

Well don't leave us hangin'! Did he do it or is he a hypocrite?

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

How did he react to that?

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Or the dangly bits between your legs.

They could investigate Nullo culture 😉

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

Of course they do. They are trash humans.

[–] RockyC@lemm.ee 39 points 2 months ago (5 children)

All of that war and they are right back to where they were before we invaded.

Your tax dollars at work.

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They worked well, do you know how much oil we got, and how many defense contracts where signed? What did you think they where taking your money for? Social programs? That would be communism! 🙃

[–] Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Don't forget the copious amounts of opium that were grown, harvested and sold.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

The movie Charlie Wilson's War gives a nice prelude to the 2001 war. The good news is, the fraction of the cost of the war in the 80s that education of the people would have cost was saved...and spent in just days the next time around.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, the democracy bombs didn't work. Maybe next time, eh?

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What if we send them to someone else first, and let them drop The Democracy right on the civilian population? Damn, still not working. Must need smarter, more sophisticated bombs...

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Course its right back - they won.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

More like Trump handed them a win (and all of their peeps freed). To say they “won” is reductive af

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well the USA was never fighting for arabic womens rights....

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

The number of well-educated men with comfortable lives who are willing to sacrifice themselves are very small. I'm not talking about people like Osama bin Laden, who are happy to send other people to die, I'm talking about the people who are willing to do the actual fighting, killing, and being killed. Some of the best solutions to terrorism are education and financial security.

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right, afghans aren't arabs

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

In what way do you say that?

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yeah, project 2025 should be called project 1025 too :/

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] curry@programming.dev 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A tragedy for the afghan people. Even more so, since there's a sizeable chunk of their own population supporting them.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but I bet a ton of that support is on an "or else" basis.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I wish I could agree with you, but we found out that isn't true the hard way over the last 25 years....

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And voices? Damn, that's a whole other level. No casually looking at men is even more edgy yet.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

those Afghani trump trucks are ridiculous.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Fucking pathetic and disgusting.