This is not a "transgender" issue. This is a "Texas' fascist AG rejecting the rule of law" issue. Ken Paxton is maliciously not just refusing to do his job but perpetrating acts of sabotage and must be removed.
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
181 points (95.9% liked)
News
22839 readers
3623 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
On Tuesday, DPS stopped accepting court orders as a basis to change a person's sex on their drivers license, the agency announced in a statement Wednesday evening. The change was prompted by the office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's concerns about "the validity" of court orders.
Employees are also instructed to “scan into the record” court orders or other documentation relating to the sex change request.It is not clear how that information will be used. Two years ago, Paxton directed employees at DPS to compile a list of individuals who had changed their gender on their Texas driver’s licenses and other department records.
Court orders are issued by a legal court, yes? So that department is actively blocking a judicial ruling? Couldn't that department then be fined for that shit?
God, I wish it was that easy when I changed my name and gender… and that was in California! My understanding is CA doesn’t require this anymore, but after I got my court order I had to get my doctor to fill out this form certifying me as a Real Transgender before the DMV would update shit. And this wasn’t in the 90s or anything, it was less than a decade ago. I consider myself lucky that the requirement to publish an ad in the paper announcing your name change was removed before I got mine done.
the requirement to publish an ad in the paper announcing your name change
What the fuck? Please tell me this is a joke that's going over my head.
Edit: Holy shit, I just looked into it, I had no idea this was a thing in some states. What the hell, how is this not considered incredibly endangering to people?
It absolutely is not a joke. It’s normal for regular name changes to require publishing a notice in the paper as well, the idea being that it’s a way to keep people honest (or at least findable) if someone is changing their name to duck out on their debts. There are exceptions for publishing notices if you’re changing your name due to domestic violence and stuff like that too.
But as is immediately obvious to anyone with a couple of brain cells to rub together, it can be INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS to a trans person to announce in the paper that they’re having a big trans name change!
I changed mine a decade ago in NY, it was a requirement then. The judge almost denied my name change because he couldn't comprehend why someone would change their name for non-marital reasons.
Having legal recognition as a trans person is a lot easier now, but it's still not perfect and requires so many layers of additional bullshit bureaucracy that cis people don't have to deal with.
My state still does that and requires an updated birth certificate and social security card. My birth state requires an updated driver's license and secondary ID and court order. I don't have the energy, time, and money to argue with 2 states, the judicial system, and multiple federal offices, and get a therapist to sign off on the fact that I'm not just submitting myself to all this as an elaborate prank.
The headline really fucking buried the lede here. Texas is secretly compiling a list of trans residents for unknown reasons, we only know this because of a whistleblower.
Updating sex on driver's licence - 😡
Shooting civillian because they reached for their driver's licence - 🥰
"This license here says you're a man. I'm going to have to take you in for stealing someone's ID."
Just another way for cops to oppress queer people.