this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5022 readers
382 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This means that the new-built vehicles will burn fossil fuels for decades to come.

Access options:

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because nobody wants the Electric vehicles they make.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not nobody; they're actually selling a lot. It's that they're building large expensive pickup trucks, rather than trying for smaller cheaper vehicles that appeal to a big chunk of the population

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

... and removing options from those versus the ICE versions. In my case, removing the front-row middle seat option from the F-150 Lightning took that sonofabitch off my preferred next-vehicle list. Can't fit my whole family? Don't want it.

Mock me for having a large family that restricts my choice in vehicles, but consider: I could just buy what I want and cart them everywhere with two+ vehicles like our neighbors and extended family do with their large broods.

There is no up-shot to removing passenger capacity from a vehicle. Not when so many EV's have a got-damn Frunk.

[–] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't see it personally. That doesn't mean I don't agree with you, because I do, but people buying expensive trucks don't have interest from what I've seen. They either buy that expensive gas truck, or buy Rivian, that's just from me seeing buying and selling cars for work.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are pretty intense local brand preferences. Nationally Ford has been selling more

[–] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I still don't see it personally. Like I literally mean I agree with you but I just don't see people (Nationwide) in my industry buying them and not so much, it doesn't happen, or it's not possible.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't doubt you that it's not happening in your circle. It's pretty definitely happening though:

Sales of America’s No. 1 selling electric truck, the F-150 Lightning, totaled 15,645 through June of this year. F-150 Lightning sales for Q2 totaled 7,902, up 77 percent from a year ago.

Rivian isn't selling as many:

Rivian Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIVN) today announced production and delivery totals for the quarter ending June 30, 2024. The company produced 9,612 vehicles at its manufacturing facility in Normal, Illinois and delivered 13,790 vehicles during the same period.

Now...Ford doesn't appear to be trying to scale up and Rivian is, so I expect this to change in the future. But it's definitely a lot that are selling.

[–] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, that's why I agreed with you.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Batteries are too expensive still. If the price halves one more, it will be viable alternative

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also that they're trying to build large, expensive vehicles which need much larger batteries.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

... and using that as an excuse to remove passenger capacity when they should be expanding it.