this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
173 points (98.3% liked)

News

23258 readers
2796 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Affordable Care Act is back under attack. Not as in the repeal-and-replace debates of yore, but in a fresher take from Republican lawmakers who say key parts of the ACA cost taxpayers too much and provide incentive for fraud.

Several House Republican leaders have called on two watchdog agencies to investigate, while Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) fired off more than half a dozen questions in a recent letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

...

While potential fraud in government programs has always been a rallying cry for conservatives, the recent criticisms are a renewed line of attack on the ACA because repealing it is unlikely, given that more than 21 million people enrolled in marketplace plans for this year.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

conservatives hate ultraconservative healthcare program they created because money is more important than human beings

the 'pro life' party, folks.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 months ago

These motherfuckers sure hate people having healthcare

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Take away their health insurance paid by taxpayers ez. Also ban them from buying any private insurance

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Congress should be enrolled in the base tier Medicare program and barred from buying any private insurance on top. Health insurance reform would follow within 6mo.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

Congress was actually mandated to use the exchanges created by the ACA. It was an amendment proposed by a Republican, who bought the narrative that Democrats were forcing bad insurance on the American people, and would never subject themselves to it. Democrats actually thought that was a great idea and went for it.

Republicans have since railed against the amendment they proposed, claiming Democrats opted themselves out of Obamacare.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, no, MAKE them buy private insurance. Force them to understand how completely fucked up that industry is. Regularly audit their intersections with those companies as part of their regular financial disclosures to make sure they aren’t getting a deal from their carriers for favorable legislative results.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that there are some relatively good private insurance plans out there, of you can afford them. It isn't all fucked up, just what the bottom 75% can afford.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True, but those plans are not cheap, and congresspeople, while not at all poor, don’t make all that much.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

They make money somehow (probably insider trading and "lobbying"). 50% of Congress are millionaires compared to 1% or less of the general population.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They most likely have private insurance on top of their govt plan. The top tier shit where the doctor comes to you

[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

So they're complaining about fraud perpetrated by unscrupulous private insurers and calling for more government oversight? Watch out, boys, you're dangerously close to getting it!

Too bad their proposed "solutions" are ass-backwards victim-blaming.

[–] greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Grassley is turning 91 in a month. Probably mad he’s gonna die soon so he wants others to join him by not having healthcare.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That kind of evil never dies. He's a very calm, insidious type of evil. Not the rage-filled kind like trump. Hell outlive your kids, while a painting gets older and older.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What possible relevance could this 90 year old person’s opinions have on, well, anything?

The Paragon Health Institute report estimates that the number of people who enrolled in ACA coverage for this year who projected they would earn between 100% of the federal poverty level and 150% — amounts that qualify them for zero-premium plans and smaller deductibles — likely exceeds the number of people with that level of income, particularly in nine states.

It recommends several changes to the ACA, including letting the enhanced subsidies expire, increasing repayment amounts for people who fail to project their incomes correctly, and ending the Biden-backed initiative that allows very low-income people to [enroll in ACA coverage year-round] rather than having to wait for the once-a-year general open enrollment period.

The Paragon report was cited by both Grassley and the House GOP lawmakers in their letters to government overseers. It also notes what they consider a related concern: ongoing problems of unscrupulous, commission-seeking agents enrolling people in ACA coverage or switching their plans without their permission, often into highly subsidized plans.

Some critics, though, question how the Paragon analysis was done.

For instance, Paragon’s findings rely on two unrelated data sets from different years. Combining them makes many people who are eligible for subsidies appear to be ineligible, said Gideon Lukens, a senior fellow and director of research at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “The analytic approach is not careful or sophisticated enough to provide accurate or even meaningful results.”

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

15 years ago I fucked his granddaughter in the ass while she was dressed as "pokeahotass". I would love to tell him that story to his face. Fuck that guy. What kind of psychopath is so hell bent on screwing the country that he refuses to retire and relax?

[–] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TOO OLD TO GOVERN ANYTHING

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Too old to govern his own house. Let alone anybody else. I will die a happy man knowing I put my 6.5" in his granddaughters ass.

[–] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Eskimo bros?

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I met Grassley a a fundraiser 50 years ago. He was an idiot then.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Oh, are they already done approving the fiscal budget for October 1st? Everything is appropriated? We have time for other bullshit?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Given how opposed to healthcare conservatives are, we should expand Medicare to all Americans, call it "Lib-Care" and allow the conservative shitbags to opt the fuck out. Let conservatives figure out their own health situation.

Conservatives are a deadly cancer of inhumanity, oppression and death. May their cure come swiftly.