I could apply the same argument to my massive ~~pirated~~ legitimately acquired media archive
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
1180 readers
80 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
Just sign up for a Disney+ trial once, so they can’t sue anymore and are forced into arbitration forever.
not legal advice
it’s probably not a good idea to anger Mr. Mouse
Exactly. Number of users: 1
This is the real reason Stanford tried to memory hole this talk.
This is what their lawyers have been advising from the start.
~~Easier~~ More profitable to seek forgiveness than ask permission.
Yesterday:
But if nobody uses your product, it doesn’t matter that you stole all the content.
And do not quote me.
At this point, Brynjolfsson points out that, “You’re on camera,” to which Schmidt responds:
Yeah, that’s right. But you see my point.
This morning...
Eric Schmidt Walks Back Claim Google Is Behind on AI Because of Remote Work: https://archive.ph/R9mlK
Bro there is no legal mess. Otherwise the fucking google search engine would violate copyright, learning from books would as well. Don't get me wrong, i really don't like "ai" but thats just so goddamm stupid.